FCE - Examination Report Dec 2000 0101.pdf

(114 KB) Pobierz
FCE Dec 2000 Examiners Report
First Certificate in English
Examination Report
Syllabus 0101
December 2000
CONTENTS
Page
Introduction
1
Paper 1 - Reading
3
Paper 2 - Writing
6
Paper 3 - Use of English
11
Paper 4 - Listening
15
Paper 5 - Speaking
20
Feedback Form
26
© UCLES 2001 0101
INTRODUCTION
The First Certificate in English examination appeared in its revised format for the first time in
December 1996.
This Report is intended to provide a general view of how candidates performed on each
paper and to offer guidance on the preparation of candidates.
The overall pass rate for Syllabus 0101 was 50.18%
The following table gives details of the percentage of candidates at each grade.
0101
GRADE
PERCENTAGE
A
0 3.09
B
10.36
C
36.73
D
0 9.46
E
40.36
Grading
Grading took place during January 2000 (approximately six weeks after the examination).
The five FCE papers total 200 marks, after weighting. Papers 1–5 are each weighted to 40
marks. The candidate’s overall FCE grade is based on the total score gained by the
candidate in all five papers. Candidates do not ‘pass’ or ‘fail’ in a particular paper, but rather
in the examination as a whole.
The overall grades (A, B, C, D and E) are set according to the following information:
statistics on the candidature;
statistics on the overall candidate performance;
statistics on individual items, for those parts of the examination for which this is
appropriate (Papers 1, 3 and 4);
the advice of the Principal Examiners, based on the performance of candidates, and on
the recommendation of examiners where this is relevant (Papers 2 and 5);
comparison with statistics from previous years' examination performance and
candidature.
Results are reported as three passing grades (A, B and C) and two failing grades (D and E).
The minimum successful performance which a candidate typically requires in order to
achieve a grade C corresponds to about 60% of the total marks. Every candidate is provided
with a Statement of Results which includes a graphical display of the candidate’s
performance in each component. These are shown against the scale Exceptional – Good –
Borderline – Weak and indicate the candidate’s relative performance in each paper.
Awards
The Awarding Committee meets after the grade boundaries have been confirmed. It deals
with all cases for special consideration, e.g., temporary disability, unsatisfactory examination
conditions, suspected collusion, etc. The committee can ask for scripts to be re-marked,
check results, change grades, withhold results, etc. Results may be withheld because of
infringement of the regulations or because further investigation is needed. Schools are
notified if a candidate’s result has been scrutinised by the Awarding Committee.
© UCLES 2001 0101
1
26268447.001.png
Notification of Results
Candidates’ statements of results are issued through their local centre approximately two
months after the examination has been taken. Certificates are issued about six weeks after
the issue of statements of results. Requests for a check on results may be made through the
local centre within one month of the issue of statements of results.
UCLES produces the following documents which may be of use in preparing candidates for
FCE:
Regulations (produced annually, for information on dates, etc.);
FCE Handbook (for detailed information on the examination and sample materials);
Examination Report (produced after each administration);
4, sample Speaking Test materials, answer
keys, cassette and tapescript for Paper 4, and Paper 2 mark schemes and sample
scripts).
Users of this Examination Report may find it useful to refer simultaneously to the
relevant Past Paper Pack. This, together with further copies of this report, is available from
the centre through which candidates entered, or from
EFL Information
University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate
1 Hills Road
Cambridge
CB1 2EU
UK
Tel: +44 1223 553930
Fax: +44 1223 460278
email efl@ucles.org.uk
www.cambridge-efl.org.uk
Feedback on this Report is very welcome and should be sent to the Reports Co-ordinator,
EFL, at UCLES. Please use the feedback form at the end of this report.
© UCLES 2001 0101
2
Past Paper Pack (available approximately ten weeks after each examination session,
including Question Papers for Papers 1
PAPER 1 - READING
Part
Task Type and Focus
Number of
Questions
Syllabus 0101
Task Format
1
Multiple-matching
Main focus: main points
7
A text preceded by multiple-
matching questions.
Candidates must match a
prompt from one list to a
prompt in another list, or match
prompts to elements in the text.
2
Multiple-choice
Main focus: detail
8
A text followed by four-option
multiple-choice questions.
3
Gapped text
Main focus: text structure
6
A text from which paragraphs
or sentences have been
removed and placed in jumbled
order after the text. Candidates
must decide from where in the
text the paragraphs or
sentences have been removed.
4
Multiple-matching,
multiple-choice
Main focus: specific
information
14
As Part 1
Marking
Candidates record their answers on a separate answer sheet, which is scanned by computer.
Questions in Parts 1, 2 and 3 carry two marks each. Questions in Part 4 carry one mark
each. The total score is adjusted to give a mark out of 40.
Candidate performance
In general, candidates coped reasonably with the task formats of the paper. Statistics
showed that the questions in all four parts provided a very reliable assessment of candidates'
relative ability levels.
© UCLES 2001 0101
3
26268447.002.png
Part 1, Firework displays to remember
This headings task, focusing on the understanding of the main points in the text, presented
more difficulty than usual for this task type. Question 3 was the easiest, while 1 and 2 were
the most difficult. Good candidates coped reasonably well with these two questions, and
incorrect responses were evenly spread amongst the distractors.
Part 2, The new secretary
This four-option multiple-choice task focused mainly on candidates’ detailed comprehension
and included a reference question. Candidates found it to be the easiest part of the paper on
this occasion. Questions 8, 9 and 15 were generally very well handled, while 11 and 12 were
particularly difficult for weaker candidates. Good candidates had few problems with either
question, and incorrect responses were widely spread.
Part 3, A big hand
This gapped-sentence task, focusing on text structure, proved to be the most difficult part of
the paper, as is frequently the case. Questions 20 and 21 were the most difficult, but the
general level of performance was rather low, with good candidates also experiencing some
difficulty with these final questions.
Part 4, Could you write a best seller?
This multiple-matching task focused on candidates' ability to retrieve specific information from
the text. Candidates performed considerably better on this part than on Parts 1 and 3. As in
the last administration, very few candidates failed to complete all 35 questions, and this is an
encouraging trend. Question 29 was the easiest question, while questions 23 and 27 proved
especially problematic for the weaker group. In 23, there is no mention in B, the most
popular incorrect response, of what proportion of a manuscript should be sent to a publisher.
In 27, it is possible that misinterpretation of the unfamiliar word ‘budding’ in B distracted the
candidates’ attention from the more accessible sentence ‘You need talent, a good publisher
and lots of luck’ in D.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CANDIDATE PREPARATION
Teachers and students should note that no single FCE 1 paper includes all possible tasks or
question types. The FCE Handbook lists all the task types which may appear on the paper.
In addition to specific examination practice, students should be advised to read as widely as
they can, with a range of reading purposes reflecting those sampled in the paper (retrieving
relevant information, getting the 'gist', understanding detail, etc.). Many of the texts for the
Reading Paper are drawn from magazines and newspapers, rather than books, and students
will benefit from being familiar with these types of text.
Specific work on the identification, location and presentation of main ideas would benefit
candidates in Parts 1 and 3.
Focusing on the sequence of tenses in running text and extended noun/pronoun sequences
would also be beneficial, particularly in Part 3 (see Dos and Don’ts).
© UCLES 2001 0101
4
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin