Routledge - A.Easthope - Literary into Cultural Studies - Antony Easthope.pdf

(1432 KB) Pobierz
Literary.into.Cultural.Studies.eBook-EEn
182970809.001.png
182970809.002.png
182970809.003.png
LITERARY INTO CULTURAL
STUDIES
Antony Easthope
For fifty years the paradigm of literary studies has relied on an
opposition between the canon and its other, popular culture. The theory
wars of the 1980s changed all that. With the advent of post-structuralism
and the ‘death of literature’ the opposition between high and popular
culture became untenable, transforming the field of inquiry from
literary into cultural studies.
Antony Easthope argues that the new discipline of cultural studies
must have a new, decentred paradigm for the common study of
canonical and popular texts together. Through a detailed criticism of
competing theory, including British cultural studies, New Historicism
and cultural materialism, he shows how this new study should—and
should not—be done.
Easthope’s exploration of the problems, possibilities and politics of
cultural studies takes on the often evaded question of literary value; also
in a reading of Conrad’s Heart of Darkness alongside Burroughs’
Tarzan of the Apes he demonstrates how the opposition between high
and popular culture can be deconstructed.
Antony Easthope is Professor in English and Cultural Studies at
Manchester Metropolitan University. He has held visiting fellowships at
Wolfson College, Oxford, the University of Adelaide and at the
Commonwealth Center for the Study of Literary and Cultural Change at
the University of Virginia. His publications include Poetry as Discourse
(1983), The Masculine Myth in Popular Culture (1986) and British
Post-Structuralism (1988).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank all those who were at the Commonwealth Center
for the Study of Literary and Cultural Change in 1990 for their support
and constructive criticism when I was working on this book, Carlos
Betancourth, Alice Gambrell, Ravindra Khare, Martin Kreiswirth and
Roland Simon, as well as visitors to the Center, Stephen Bann, Maud
Ellmann, Toril Moi, Constance Penley, Janice Radway, Stephen Railton,
Andrew Ross, Brian Stock and Hayden White. My largest debt is of
course to Ralph Cohen, whose benign and enabling authority makes the
work of the Center possible.
I am also deeply grateful to people who found time to read the
manuscript: Kate Belsey, Stewart Crehan, Nancy Loevinger and Ray
Selden. Kate McGowan, Stephen Priest, Hugh Silverman and Janet
Wolff made valuable comments on particular sections. A discussion
with Richard Rorty led to changes in Chapter 3 , though I suspect his
influence throughout has been greater than ‘I’m aware. Through both
agreements and disagreements, I have been helped by all of these,
though it remains the case that what goes into a text is one thing, what
comes out of it another.
Some of the material for Chapter 2 appeared in the British Journal of
Aesthetics, 25 (4) (Autumn 1985). Chapter 5 began as joint work with
Margaret Beetham and as such was given as a paper at the Cultural
Value conference at Birkbeck College, London, in July 1988; Margaret
has since decided to concentrate on her work on women’s magazines but
I am glad to acknowledge how much I learned from collaborating with
her. An earlier version of Chapter 3 was published in Textual Practice,
4 (3) (Winter 1990). Part of Chapter 8 was given as a paper at the
Anglistentag 1989 at Würzburg and published in the Proceedings edited
by Rüdiger Ahrens (Max Niemeyer, Tübingen, 1990). Some ideas
drawn on for Chapter 9 appeared in Theory/Pedagogy/Politics: Texts
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin