Remote Viewing - The Nina Reiser Case by The Aurora Remote Viewing Group v4.2 - July 2008.pdf - Radiestezja i psychotronika - morefaya2006

Remote Viewing

The Nina

Reiser Case

July

2008

Version 4.2

Remote Viewing the Nina Reiser Case

This is a story about the disappearance of the mother of two young children, in Oakland,

California, a city of 420,000 people, across the Bay from San Francisco. Oakland is known for

many things – sharing the Bay Area with San Francisco, its exceptionally sunny weather, its

vibrant multi‐ethnic mix, its professional sports teams ‐ the Raiders and the A's ‐ and for its

very high murder rate. It is not known for the disappearance of mothers in the Oakland hills.

This is also about something called remote viewing. You may or may not have heard about

it, although it is becoming increasingly known on the Internet and even in the movies.

Suspect Zero starring Ben Kingsley is a film about remote viewing, although it presented a

heavily fictionalized version. The film makes it seem that remote viewers have a cinema‐like

image of a place or event in their mind, but this is almost never the case. Remote viewing

could be termed a psychic craft. It is real – and our tax dollars supported a 20‐year remote

viewing program conducted by agencies of the US government. The program would never

have been funded year after year if it had not been producing some bona fide results. The

US government spent over $20 million on the program before abandoning it in 1996. We

will say more about what remove viewing is as this article unfolds.

The main thrust of this report is to follow the history of the disappearance of this young

woman named Nina Reiser, including the efforts to find her, both conventional and with

remote viewing, the trial that resulted, and the surprising aftermath.

We will present the story as it developed. You will see the deployment of remote viewing by

a professional team and get a good sense of how a remote viewing project unfolds. Both

verbal and graphic data from remote viewing sessions will be included. We will present the

large amount of relevant data that a team can produce while not consciously knowing what

the objective (or target) is. We will also show some of the challenges such a project faces

and difficulties that arise as the remote viewing data is received by the project manager. We

will include the considerable amount we got right, and an important facet that we got

wrong.

This piece is written both for those with no knowledge of remote viewing as well as for

those versed in the field. Remote viewing deserves to be better known and we believe this

effort will convince readers with an open mind that there is indeed something – indeed a

great deal ‐‐ to this phenomenon. Remote viewing has been scientifically demonstrated to

exist – but public awareness lags. We believe those familiar with the field will also find this

piece of considerable interest. You can scour the Internet or the 30+ books about the

subject, and find much discussion about its history, and many claims, but few actual remote

viewing sessions, much less a remote viewing project from start to finish. (As an aid to

looking more into remote viewing, we have appended a list of resources.) There has been

quite a bit of teaching done, often offered at a high cost, by viewers who were part of the

military program after it became public, but on the whole very little display of actual remote

viewing sessions. This is most unfortunate. We offer this account in the hope that it will

begin to fill the large gap between the claims that have been prevalent in the field and the

expectations that have been created.

As we present the main features of this unfortunate saga, we will interpolate additional

information about remote viewing.

The Disappearance of Nina Reiser

Let's begin with what happened on Sunday, September 3, 2006 in the hills above Oakland,

California. On that day, Nina Reiser, age 31, a recent Russian immigrant, was dropping off

her two kids at the house where her estranged husband, Hans Reiser, lived. The house was

owned by Hans Reiser's mother; Beverly Palmer.

Hans Reiser was famous in the Linux software community as the inventor of the widely used

Reiser FS file system. He had founded a company called Namesys and had hired

programmers in Russia to further develop the software. While in Russia himself, he had met

Nina Sharanova and the two had fallen in love, had been married in 1999 and had had two

children, Rory and Niorline. However, for a few years now they had been in the midst of a

divorce which had become very contentious. Hans Reiser was living at his mother's house in

the Montclair District of Oakland at 6979 Exeter Drive. His mother, Beverly Palmer, was

away that weekend at the counter‐cultural Burning Man Festival in Nevada. Reiser would

have the house to himself, along with the two children, after Nina dropped them off.

After leaving the kids at Beverly Palmer's house around 2:20 p.m. on September 3, 2006,

Nina Reiser disappeared.

Her long‐time friend Ellen Doren was the first person to be aware that something was amiss,

since Nina was scheduled to have dinner with her that evening at about 5:30. When Nina

did not show up, Doren became alarmed and phoned Nina's cell phone several times. There

was no answer. Doren informed Nina's boyfriend, Anthony Zografos. Alarmed, he too called

Nina's cell phone several times but got only the message on the answering machine.

Following the Memorial Day holiday on Monday, Ellen Doren notified the Oakland police on

September 6, 2006 that Nina Reiser was missing. The police began to investigate and soon

focused on the estranged husband, Hans Reiser. Some of the circumstantial evidence that

led them to do this will be mentioned later on. (For extensive detail about the history of this

case, please consult the web sites listed at the end of this report.)

Good friends of Nina Reiser, including teachers at the local school where the Reiser kids

went for daycare, formed a committee to help search for her. They set up a web site with

pictures of Nina and offered a reward which eventually totaled $25,000. The public was

urged to submit to the police any information they had that bore on the case and a police

phone number was given for that purpose.

Next, before discussing the work of our remote viewing team on this case, let's look a bit

more at what remote viewing is as well as some of its history.

What Is Remote Viewing?

In the early 1970's the US intelligence community was worried about long‐time rival

superpower, the USSR. In particular they were worried that the Russians might have made

significant progress in the use of psychics or clairvoyants, in what the Russians called

psychotronics. After all, Bulgaria had had a government‐paid psychic (Vanga Dimitrova) and

some Eastern European countries had utilized clairvoyants for military purposes during

World War II. A book by Sheila Ostrander and Lynn Schroeder, Psychic Discoveries Behind

the Iron Curtain, had been published and had made an impression on US intelligence with its

accounts of supposed psychic spying and other 'paranormal' feats. Could it be that the

Russians had developed secret psychic weapons – could they read someone's mind, could

they injure or kill at a distance? If so, from the point of view of US intelligence, the "psi gap"

needed to be narrowed.

As it turned out, two laser physicists, Russell Targ and Hal Puthoff had been investigating

what came to be called remote viewing at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in California.

Puthoff brought a natural psychic named Ingo Swann from New York City to the West Coast,

and SRI was testing his and others' remote sensing abilities. In one such series, an

"outbounder" would open a sealed envelope he had been given and drive 20 minutes or so

away from the lab to the location specified. He would then stay at the site for a few minutes

and later report back what he saw. The remote viewer back in the lab would describe what

was at the scene where the outbound person was – and often do so successfully ‐‐ and this

could be done even if the viewing were done before the outbounder got to the destination.

In remote viewing, time was not what it seemed. Nor was space: remote viewers could view

locations at any distance, including the planets.

The CIA verified to its satisfaction that there was a genuine phenomenon and entered into a

contract with Stanford Research Institute to develop a method that worked and to train

remote viewers. Swann took the lead in this effort. Over many months he evolved a set of

procedures which was termed Coordinate Remote Viewing (CRV). This is a detailed

methodology using pen and paper which the remote viewer follows to produce impressions

of the target; i.e., what is at the location or place.

The military itself later became directly involved and ran its own programs, using Swann's

method, in the main. The program went by many names over the 20 years of its existence –

e.g., Grill Flame, Sun Streak, Center Lane and the most famous one, Star Gate. (This is

distinct from the TV series of the same name.) During that time hundreds if not thousands

of remote viewing sessions were done. The data from those sessions was submitted as part

of the intelligence mix – one form of human intelligence to go with Signal Intelligence and

other intelligence "products". It was found that remote viewing was useful but by no means

flawless. Accurate data was nearly always mixed with inaccurate data. Nonetheless the

program survived uncertain round after round of funding over the years and continued to

produce information utilized by US military and intelligence agencies.

In 1996 the CIA decided to unburden itself of the program and sponsored a report that said,

in effect, even though the technique had been used and was funded and refunded for 20

years, Really, there is nothing to it. Their claim was that remote viewing had not

demonstrated its usefulness to the intelligence community. This was a misstatement, to say

the least.

After the program was (ostensibly) disbanded in 1996, several remote viewers who had

been in military intelligence began teaching remote viewing to the public and some

launched remote viewing companies. These included Sergeant First Class Lyn Buchanan,

Major Paul Smith, Captain David Morehouse and Major Ed Dames. F. Holmes "Skip" Atwater

joined the Monroe Institute in Virginia to explore the possibilities. Joe McMoneagle, viewer

001, undertook extensive work in laboratories as well as client work. McMoneagle, virtually

alone among the group, has repeatedly demonstrated his exceptional abilities on television,

including many times on Japanese television and is widely considered the world's foremost

remote viewer. Ingo Swann continued his work in the laboratory and wrote copiously on the

subject. In the succeeding years, many civilians were trained in remote viewing and entered

Remote Viewing - The Nina Reiser Case by The Aurora Remote Viewing Group v4.2 - July 2008.pdf

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika: