s1042368008000089.pdf

(1931 KB) Pobierz
doi:10.1016/j.nec.2008.02.007
Neurosurg Clin N Am 19 (2008) 251–264
Translabyrinthine Approach for Acoustic
Tumor Removal
Derald E. Brackmann, MD a , * , J. Douglas Green, Jr, MD b
a House Ear Clinic and Institute, Los Angeles, California (DEB); and the Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida (JDG)
b Jacksonville Hearing and Balance Institute, 10475 Centurion pky N, Jacksonville, FL 32256, USA
The translabyrinthine approach is the most
direct route to the cerebellopontine angle. We
believe that this approach offers many advantages
for acoustic tumor removal. In this article, the
indications and relative contraindications for the
approach are outlined. The surgical technique is
then detailed and illustrated.
approach. Perforations of the tympanic mem-
brane should first be repaired, following which
the translabyrinthine approach may be used
when healing has occurred. In the case of
a mastoid cavity, a total obliteration is first
performed with blind sac closure of the external
auditory canal. The translabyrinthine approach
may then be performed when healing has
occurred. A relative contraindication is a patient
who has good hearing and a tumor amenable to
a hearing conservation approach as already
described.
Indications
Small tumors that extend no further than
5 mm into the cerebellopontine angle in patients
with good hearing are usually approached via the
middle fossa [1] . Larger tumors in which good
hearing remains are approached via the retrosig-
moid route. This route is ideal when the tumor
arises more medially and is not impacted into
the fundus of the internal auditory canal and
does not expand the canal.
In general, the outlook for hearing preserva-
tion for acoustic tumors with greater than 2 cm
extension into the cerebellopontine angle is very
poor. These tumors and all tumors with poor
hearing are removed via the translabyrinthine
approach. There is no tumor too large to be
approached via the translabyrinthine route. For
large tumors, more bone removal is accomplished
posterior to the sigmoid sinus to gain access.
Advantages
The translabyrinthine approach offers several
advantages for acoustic tumor removal. It re-
quires a minimum of cerebellar retraction. Expo-
sure and dissection of the lateral end of the
internal auditory canal ensures complete tumor
removal from that area and allows positive
identification of the facial nerve at a consistent
anatomic location [2] .
If the facial nerve is lost during acoustic tumor
removal, the translabyrinthine approach offers the
best opportunity for immediate repair by end-to-
end anastomosis or interposition of a nerve graft
[3] .
Contraindications
There is a lower incidence of cerebrospinal
fluid leaks with this approach compared with the
retrosigmoid approach.
Finally and most importantly, this approach
carries the lowest morbidity and mortality. The
mortality rate for this approach is 0.4% for the
last 2300 cases [4] . Experienced teams performing
the retrosigmoid approach are reporting nearly
equivalent mortality rates.
The presence of chronic otitis media is
a contraindication for the translabyrinthine
The article is originally appeared in Otolaryngologic
Clinics of NA: Vol. 25, issue 2, April; 1992. p. 311–330.
* Corresponding author: House Ear Clinic, 2122
West Third Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057.
1042-3680/08/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.nec.2008.02.007
377237142.002.png
252
BRACKMANN & GREEN
Limitations
toward the opposite side and maintained in
a natural position without fixation. The surgeon
is then seated at the patient’s side. This position
minimizes fatigue and allows stabilization of the
arms and hands during the exacting microsurgical
procedures ( Fig. 1 ).
The obvious disadvantage of the translabyrin-
thine approach is the sacrifice of any residual
hearing in the operated ear. The approach is
therefore reserved for patients whose hearing is
poor or for large tumors in which the possibility
of hearing preservation is slight.
In the past, it has been said that the approach
is limited to smaller tumors. As already stated, we
have not found this to be true. There is no tumor
too large to be approached translabyrinthine. In
fact, we believe that there are advantages for large
and giant tumors in that the approach puts one
directly into the center of the tumor at its origin.
Intracapsular removal of the tumor allows the
capsule to be displaced toward the opening by
surrounding brain structures.
Instruments
Standard neurotologic instruments are used.
One special instrument s used and is discussed
later.
Anesthesia
General endotracheal anesthesia with inhala-
tion agents is used. Muscle relaxants are used only
for induction of anesthesia because intraoperative
monitoring of facial nerve activity is routinely
used. Prophylactic antibiotics or steroids are not
routinely used. Occasionally with very large
tumors these measures are employed. A nasogas-
tric tube and Foley catheter are placed after the
patient is asleep.
Technique
Preparation for surgery
The patient is placed supine on the operating
table with the head at the foot of the table. This
allows the anesthesiologist, who is seated at the
patient’s feet, easy access to the controls for
moving the table. The patient’s head is turned
Operative technique
The suboccipital area, pinna, and ear canal are
prepared with povidone-iodine (Betadine
Fig. 1. Room arrangement for the translabyrinthine aproach. Note positions of surgeon, anesthesiologist, and nurse.
377237142.003.png
TRANSLABYRINTHINE APPROACH FOR ACOUSTIC TUMOR REMOVAL
253
solution), and plastic drapes are applied. A
postauricular incision is made approximately
2 cm behind the postauricular crease ( Fig. 2 ).
The incision is curved anteriorly to allow anterior
retraction of the pinna. The posterior curve of the
incision allows access to the area behind the
sigmoid sinus. Because most of the surgical view
of the cerebellopontine angle is along the plane
of the posterior fossa dura, posterior access is
important.
The incision first extends to the fascia tempo-
ralis, and the dissection is carried to the linea
temporalis, lateral to the fascia temporalis. An
incision is then made through the fascia and
periosteum along the linea temporalis posteriorly
to the sinodural angle and then inferiorly on the
mastoid bone to the mastoid tip. The Lempert
periosteal elevator is used to free the postauricular
tissues from the underlying cortex, posterior to
the sinodural angle and forward until the spine of
Henle and the external auditory canal are identi-
fied. Care must be taken not to tear into the
external auditory canal because this would in-
troduce a possible route for infection. If this
should occur, the patient is placed on prophylactic
antibiotics, the defect into the external auditory
canal is repaired, and the operation is continued.
Self-retaining retractors are placed to maintain
the ear forward and to elevate the temporalis
muscle superiorly. Suction on the posterior blade
of the retractor removes excess irrigation fluid and
blood from the wound.
Cortical mastoidectomy
After adequate exposure of the cortex has been
obtained, bone removal is carried out with con-
tinuous suction-irrigation and a large cutting bur.
Bone removal is started along the external audi-
tory canal, and then a horizontal incision is made
along the temporal line. The junction of these
incisions lies over the mastoid antrum. Identifica-
tion of the mastoid antrum and the lateral semi-
circular canal therein is the key to the beginning
dissection of the temporal bone.
Bone removal continues with care taken not to
undercut the mastoid cortex. The external open-
ing must be as large as possible. The middle fossa
plate is identified superiorly and the sigmoid sinus
posteriorly. Removal of bone is then continued
over the sigmoid sinus to the area of the posterior
fossa dura. In large tumors, bone removal is
carried out far behind the sigmoid sinus. In
some cases, the bone is removed with a rongeur
or drill as far as 2 or 3 cm posterior to the sigmoid
sinus and inferiorly beneath the cerebellar hemi-
sphere. This gives more decompression of the
posterior fossa and allows room for retraction of
the dura posteriorly. Care must be taken, how-
ever, not to injure the dura. Dural tears allow the
cerebellum to herniate into the defect, which may
result in infarction of that portion of the
cerebellum.
Removal of bone over the sigmoid must be
done carefully. If the cutting bur tears the sigmoid
Fig. 2. Skin incision 2 cm behind the postauricular sarcous.
377237142.004.png
254
BRACKMANN & GREEN
sinus, profuse bleeding ensues and requires pack-
ing with oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel).
Large emissary veins often arise from the poste-
rior aspect of the sigmoid sinus. They can be
identified through the bone as it is removed, since
suction-irrigation keeps the bone clean. If the
emissary vein is injured, bleeding must be con-
trolled with bone wax, cautery, Surgicel packing,
or in some cases suture of the emissary.
and the ability to identify the structures as they
are encountered. This appreciation of the anat-
omy comes only after many hours of diligent tem-
poral bone dissection.
Labyrinthectomy
After the mastoid air cells have been removed
to the level of the horizontal semicircular canal,
labyrinthectomy is begun. Bone is removed in the
sinodural angle along the superior petrosal sinus.
This area, which is farthest from the facial nerve,
is the key to this step in the dissection. The
opening along the superior petrosal sinus is
gradually deepened and widened until the laby-
rinthine bone is encountered. The lateral and
posterior semicircular canals are then progres-
sively removed, and the facial nerve, which lies
anteriorly, is carefully approached ( Fig. 4 ). The
lateral semicircular canal is opened, and the
common crus of the superior and posterior semi-
circular canals is identified deep in the dissection.
The superior semicircular canal is followed to its
ampulla. The vestibule is then opened, and the fa-
cial nerve is skeletonized from the genu inferiorly
to near the stylomastoid foramen. It is not neces-
sary to remove bone lateral to the facial nerve;
rather, the facial nerve is skeletonized from a pos-
terior direction, where access is needed to ap-
proach the cerebellopontine angle.
Complete, simple mastoidectomy
As soon as the mastoid cortex has been
removed and the sigmoid sinus has been outlined,
the operating microscope is brought into place.
Magnification allows more accurate bone removal
and exposure of all the structures of the temporal
bone. A thin layer of bone is left over the sigmoid
sinus and around the emissary veins, and a com-
plete, simple mastoidectomy is performed down to
the level of the horizontal semicircular canal
( Fig. 3 ). It is important that the antrum be opened
and the horizontal semicircular canal be identi-
fied. This canal is the basic landmark in temporal
bone surgery. Once the position of this canal is
known, the depth and three-dimensional relation-
ship of the facial nerve and posterior and superior
semicircular canals can be viewed. Expertise in
temporal bone surgery depends on a thorough
knowledge of the anatomy of the temporal bone
Fig. 3. Mastoidectomy is completed. Facial nerve is localized and sigmoid sinus skeletonized.
377237142.005.png
TRANSLABYRINTHINE APPROACH FOR ACOUSTIC TUMOR REMOVAL
255
Fig. 4. Semicircular canals are opened. An island of bone over the sigmoid sinus is created.
The final removal of bone along the facial
nerve is accomplished with a diamond bur.
Having removed the labyrinthine bone from
posterior to the nerve, the surgeon may then use
the side of the diamond bur rather than the end
and at all times view the plane between the side of
the bur and the facial nerve. This reduces the
hazard of injury to the facial nerve, which is very
slight with this technique. As the facial nerve is
skeletonized, the cribriform area of the superior
vestibular nerve entering the vestibule is seen. It is
important to skeletonize the facial nerve ade-
quately so that the vestibule can be seen in this
area ( Fig. 5 ).
tissue. Dissection is carried inferior to the laby-
rinth, with removal of the retrofacial air cells, un-
til the blueness of the dome of the jugular bulb is
seen through the overlying bone.
As the bone posterior to the internal auditory
canal is removed, the vestibular aqueduct and the
beginning of the endolymphatic sac are removed.
Bone is further removed along the posterior fossa
dura beneath the sigmoid sinus. If the sigmoid
sinus is overhanging into the mastoid cavity,
which makes the dissection di cult, the eggshell
covering of bone over the sinus may be removed
so that the sinus can be retraced posteriorly. It is
good to leave an island of bone (Bill’s island) over
the dome of the sigmoid sinus to protect it from
the rotating bur and retraction of the suction-
irrigation at this point.
We complete the dissection around the in-
ferior portion of the internal auditory canal first.
This is the area that is farthest from the facial
nerve, and we find that completing the dissection
here makes orientation to the superior portion of
the internal auditory canal easier. Bone removal
is continued medially and anteriorly between the
dome of the jugular bulb and the internal
auditory canal until the cochlear aqueduct is
identified.
The cochlear aqueduct is not always readily
identifiable. In large tumors, it is occluded at its
Internal auditory canal dissection
After the labyrinthine bone has been removed
to the level of the vestibule, dissection of the bone
surrounding the internal auditory canal is started
( Fig. 6 ). This dissection is started along the supe-
rior petrosal sinus and then is gradually enlarged
in all directions toward the internal auditory ca-
nal. The dura of the internal auditory canal is
identified posteriorly, as is the dura of the poste-
rior fossa. This bone is gently removed, with
care taken to leave an eggshell thickness of bone
over the dura of the internal auditory canal and
the posterior fossa to prevent injury to the soft
377237142.001.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin