Driven - Lawrence & Nohria.pdf

(138 KB) Pobierz
Driven
How Human Nature Shapes Our Choices
by Paul R. Lawrence and Nitin Nohria
Jossey-Bass © 2001
315 pages
Focus
Take-Aways
Leadership
Strategy
Sales & Marketing
Corporate Finance
Human Resources
Technology
Production & Logistics
Small Business
Economics & Politics
Industries & Regions
Career Development
Personal Finance
Self Improvement
Ideas & Trends
• Scientists now believe that many behaviors are genetically infl uenced.
• Our brains are hardwired with four drives: to acquire, bond, learn and defend.
• The drives affect us all. For example, obesity might stem from the drive to acquire.
• The drive to acquire is insatiable. It will never be satisfi ed; you will never acquire enough.
• Religion is one result of the human drive to learn.
• The drives to bond and to acquire are not interchangeable. One cannot buy affection
or love.
• Our ability to bond with organizations is a key component of social evolution.
• Companies’ fates depend on leadership that carefully balances the four innate drives.
• The success of your company may depend on how well you counterbalance the
drive to acquire with the drive to bond with others.
• Capitalize on the drive to learn by properly training individuals in your organization.
Rating (10 is best)
Overall
Applicability
Innovation
Style
7
8
10
8
V i s i t o u r w e b s i t e a t w w w. g e t A b s t r a c t . c o m t o p u r c h a s e i n d i v i d u a l a b s t r a c t s , p e r s o n a l s u b s c r i p t i o n s o r c o r p o r a t e s o l u t i o n s .
getAbstract is an Internet based knowledge rating service and publisher of book abstracts. Every week, subscribers are e-mailed a short abstract of a
different business book. Each abstract contains an overview of essential ideas from the entire book. Excerpts from this book are reprinted here with the
permission of the publisher. The respective copyrights of authors and publishers are acknowledged. All rights reserved. No part of this abstract may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, or otherwise, without prior written permission of getAbstract Ltd (Switzerland).
823640681.018.png 823640681.019.png 823640681.020.png 823640681.021.png 823640681.001.png 823640681.002.png 823640681.003.png 823640681.004.png
Relevance
What You Will Learn
In this Abstract you will learn: 1) How four basic drives infl uence all human behavior,
both individual and organizational; 2) The critical impact of the drive to acquire, the
drive to bond, the drive to learn and the drive to defend, and 3) Why and how leaders
must harness these four drives to fulfi ll collective corporate goals.
Recommendation
Leave it to two Harvard business professors — Paul R. Lawrence and Nitin Nohria —
to break every rule of conventional academic etiquette. Their transgression? Applying
their knowledge of companies and individuals to present a unifi ed explanation of
human behavior, thereby encroaching on the academic fi efdoms of evolutionary biology,
psychology and anthropology, just to name a few. They use the four basic human drives
that infl uence behavior to offer deep insights into corporate and individual actions.
getAbstract.com strongly recommends this ambitious, far-ranging book to management
students, executives searching for understanding and for anyone who delights in tweaking
the collective nose of academia.
Abstract
The Four-Drive Theory
Imagine your organization as a great petri dish, where all the discordant strains of
human nature are allowed to play out, revealing eternal scientifi c truths about each
member of your company. Like it or not, that’s essentially the circumstance that you face
every day — and the question then becomes, do you really understand what drives your
people to do what they do? Or are you just guessing? The fact is that four basic drives
are hardwired into the human organism. You couldn’t escape them if you tried. Your
success, and the success of your colleagues, depends on how well you balance those four
drives, which are:
1. The drive to acquire and control objects in order to improve your status relative to others.
2. The drive to bond with other people in long-term commitments of mutual caring.
3. The drive to learn and understand the world around us.
4. The drive to defend yourself, your loved ones, your values and your resources from harm.
Why does everyone have these four innate drives, these endowed capabilities or
tendencies that defi ne human behavior? Genetics holds the answer.
In The Beginning
The modern human gene pool is so small that it makes the concept of different races
scientifi cally meaningless. All modern Homo Sapiens descended from a very small
group of perhaps 4,000 to 10,000 people. Some 70,000 to 100,000 years ago, this group
of hunter-gatherers diverged from other hominids, left Africa and began to spread its
civilization globally. Biologists agree that the same evolutionary process that shaped the
other human organs also shaped the human brain, the most complex system ever created
by evolution. Strong evidence also indicates that human language and symbolic str ucture
are also hardwired.
“Human brains
seem to be built in
a way that makes
it diffi cult to dis-
place prior ideas.
When others try, it
triggers the drive
to defend current
beliefs more often
than the drive to
learn new ones.”
“Although human
behavior is cer-
tainly greatly infl u-
enced by culture,
our four drives are
universal. Their
roots lie in human-
ity’s common evo-
lutionary heritage.”
Modern human brains contain a hundred billion neurons, and each neuron has up to
1,000 synapses that connect with other neurons. The electrochemical impulses that
Driven © Copyright 2001 get A bstract 2 of 5
823640681.005.png 823640681.006.png 823640681.007.png 823640681.008.png
convey information from one cell to the next fi re 40 times per second. About 3,200 genes
infl uence the brain’s structure and response — half again as many as affect any other
organ in the human body. Genes endow the human brain with a set of hardwired skills.
They are:
“Any fi rm that
establishes social
contracts that pro-
vide all partici-
pants with good
opportunities to
fulfi ll their drives
will, in all like-
lihood, grow to
dominate its indus-
try.”
• Understanding of how objects can be manipulated.
• Intuitive understanding of how plants and animals work on a basic level.
• Basic concepts of quantity and numbers and orientation concepts, like mapping.
• Intuitive understanding of the best territory to support human life.
• Danger signals and things to look out for, including snakes and heights.
• What foods are likely to be good to eat.
• The ability to monitor your own health and well being.
• Understanding of disease and how to avoid contamination.
• Human intuition, the ability to predict others’ responses.
• Recollection of the identities of others and awareness of yourself as a separate person.
• Kinship, an intuitive ability to recognize kinship relationships.
• Mating, a built in preference for certain types of potential mates.
The Drive to Acquire
“I own, therefore I am” seems to be many peoples’ motto today, but the drive to acquire
extends far beyond the mere possession of physical objects. Part of what you “own” is
your status. Anyone who works in a bureaucracy knows that people will defend their
own turf. Consider for example the most elemental human need — hunger. As with the
people of other nations, Americans spend billions of dollars on often-futile fad diets and
weight-loss programs. While such behavior may seem irrational, it is not, if you view
it through the process of evolution. During the era when modern humans evolved, the
Pleistocene period, the biggest threat was not heart disease but starvation.
“Once a plausible
ideology becomes
established in the
minds of a commu-
nity of people, it is
very diffi cult to dis-
lodge.”
Individuals with a taste for calorie rich foods would presumably have a better chance
of survival, and this survival characteristic is more likely to be passed to their children.
Now, you might imagine that a superior trait would be cognitive fl exibility, that is, the
ability to choose to gorge oneself in circumstances of scarcity and, yet, consume scanty
portions when food is in abundance. However, a powerful drive that manifests itself in
conscious emotions focuses behavior and attention in a precognitive way that does not
require cogitation. Your best chance of survival might be to gulp down the big meal
fi rst, and worry later about why you sated yourself. On a business level, the drive for
immediate acquisition might help explain the short-term thinking predominant among
most middle managers. For example, when it comes to organizational change, managers
are more inclined to take short-term steps such as downsizing, rather than longer-term
adaptive measures such as changing corporate culture.
“For billions of
years evolution
was a blind, mind-
less, trial-and-
error process.
Now, in the last
few steps toward
evolving humans,
it was being
guided by a pur-
posive mind. Hom-
inids were, in
effect, pulling
themselves up by
their bootstraps.”
The unhappy reality is that for most people, the drive to acquire is insatiable. Successful
acquisition may quell one’s passion to acquire for a brief period, but the urge almost
always returns full-force. To the extent that this drive dominates the other human
drives, most people will probably never be completely satisfi ed. Moreover, the drive
to acquire appears to be relative. When test subjects are asked to choose between
earning $90,000 a year in a world where their neighbors earn $100,000; or $110,000 in a
neighborhood where everyone is pulling down $200,000, they are more likely to choose
the former than the latter. Two of the most powerful, negative, human passions stem from
acquisitiveness: ambition and envy.
Driven © Copyright 2001 get A bstract 3 of 5
823640681.009.png 823640681.010.png
The Urge To Merge
Another powerful drive that motivates us, however, is the drive to bond with others.
All humans share a powerful, innate drive to bond with others. People need to build
relationships. Theory says that those without a strong urge to bond have less chance of
passing down their genes. Men who fail to demonstrate these bonds are less likely to be
chosen as good mates.
“Organizations as
well as individuals
easily drift into an
overemphasis on
one drive. This
leads in time to
the frustration of
all drives.”
Of course, the drive to acquire does not assure success in bonding, because bonding
is essentially different from acquiring. Bonding can only be fulfi lled with another
person acting in a harmonious or cooperative way. Threats of violence or intimidation
will not facilitate bonding. The bond must be mutual and involve some commitment.
Every human relationship involves a mix of acquisitive (or competitive) and bonding (or
cooperative) elements. Naturally, these two drives sometimes confl ict, but other times
they can be complementary, such as on a sports team. Marriage ceremonies, the most
obvious example of human bonding, take place, in some form, in all cultures as a public
declaration of a lasting commitment.
One important application of the urge to bond is people’s inherent tendency to bond
with the organizations for which they work. Without this, employers would have no
reason to believe that employees would do more work than they absolutely had to do to
keep their jobs.
The Drive to Learn
Strong evidence indicates that the human drive to learn is also genetically inspired. The
universality of religion as a way to explain the world is a strong piece of supporting
evidence. Art, also, could be viewed as part of the human drive to understand a
greater reality. Darwin himself observed, “The belief in unseen or spiritual agencies…
seems to be universal. Nor is it diffi cult to comprehend how it arose. As soon as
the important faculties of the imagination, wonder and curiosity, together with some
power of reasoning, had become partially developed, man would naturally crave to
understand what was passing around him, and would have vaguely speculated on his
own existence.”
“In the last anal-
ysis, the story
behind the ups and
downs of organiza-
tional life is one of
leadership.”
Learning can occur on an organizational as well as an individual level, so one of the most
important functions of any organization is constructively focusing the drive to learn.
As new members join an organization, they are socialized and indoctrinated with the
organization’s collective knowledge, including how its members contribute to its pool
of knowledge. This process can have a critical impact on the ongoing success of any
organization. As science discovers more about how to facilitate learning, the workplace
is likely to be affected. Industrial theorists have long studied the importance of creating
working conditions conducive to satisfying the intrinsic human desire to learn.
The Drive to Defend
The drive to defend is one of the most powerful human drives. When a loved one is
threatened, your initial sensation of alarm quickly gives way to either fear or anger.
Scientists now believe that the human mind is preconditioned to adopt various defensive
responses based on specifi c threats, a skill set that can be enhanced with socialization
and training.
“In relation to the
drive to defend,
work groups must
be provided with
the means to fend
off external
attacks.”
The drive to defend is always reactive — though the other drives are arguably proactive,
in that they involve searching for a desired object or condition — yet defense is often
Driven © Copyright 2001 get A bstract 4 of 5
823640681.011.png 823640681.012.png
coordinated with other drives. The drive to acquire results in ownership of property
that must be defended. The drive to bond results in relationships that, if threatened,
stimulate the drive to defend. The drive to learn can result in a willingness to defend
threatened values or beliefs. Because you may bond with your organization, your drive
to defend can swing into action if you perceive that your organization or its values are
under attack.
“Human genes do
not determine
behavior, they
actually require the
exercise of free
will, albeit as
constrained by
environmental con-
ditions.”
Applied Dynamics of the Four Drives
The four drives apply to modern business and corporate life. For example, consider the
drive to defend. Often departments or task forces take on a life of their own, defending
themselves from outside threats. Companies defend themselves against competition.
Corporations accumulate war chests of reserve funds to fi ght hostile takeovers. Anyone
who ever cheered at a football game understands it as a symbolic battle to defend a
city’s honor.
The four-drive theory implies that every employee in an organization, from the
CEO to a temporary intern, brings a predictable set of responses to work. Thus,
an organization’s leaders need to align employees’ innate drives to facilitate the
achievement of collective goals. This calls for a delicate balancing of the drive to form
bonds with the drive to acquire. The goal is to develop the constructive tension of
respectful competition among all the groups involved. Yet, organizational changes and
reforms must always be undertaken with careful consideration of the four basic drives
that motivate each employee.
“All four of the
drives of our
human nature at
work in our every-
day lives can,
when in balance,
help us fi nd the
right road forward.”
Current literature thus emphasizes two tasks incumbent upon corporate leaders. First,
leaders can facilitate the acquisitive drives of others. Second, leaders can facilitate their
employees’ bonding needs. Four-drive theory leaders must also facilitate learning and
defensive drives. Some leaders use the drive to defend to motivate employees to work,
seeking to motivate people with threats and intimidation. While this may work, it only
elicits minimal rote compliance. Leaders must rise to the challenge of understanding how
to balance the drives of individuals within an organization to maximize its effectiveness.
In the words of Abraham Lincoln, “Human nature will not change. In any future great
national trial, compared with the men of this, we shall have as weak and as strong, as
silly and as wise, as bad and as good.”
About The Author
Paul R. Lawrence and Nitin Nohria teach at Harvard Business School, where Lawrence
completed his master’s and doctorate. His research has been published in some 24 books
and articles. His work focuses on the human aspects of organization design, organization
change and human management. Nohria received his Ph.D., from the Sloan School of
Management at M.I.T., and his bachelor’s from the Indian Institute of Technology in
Bombay. The seven books he has co-authored or edited include the award-winning The
Differentiated Network . He has written more than 75 professional articles.
Buzz-Words
D rive to acquire / D rive to bond / D rive to defend / D rive to learn / F our-drive theory
Driven © Copyright 2001 get A bstract 5 of 5
823640681.013.png 823640681.014.png 823640681.015.png 823640681.016.png 823640681.017.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin