Sea Priestess.pdf

(1229 KB) Pobierz
Microsoft Word - Sea Priestess.doc
82475494.001.png
INTRODUCTION 5
A NOTE FROM THE PUBLISHER
IF one wishes to write a book that is not cut according to ny of
the standard patterns, it appears to be necessary to be one's own
publisher; therefore this book has not got the imprint of any
publishing house to lend it dignity, but must stand upon its own
feet as a literary Mekhizedek.
I once had the entertaining experience of receiving one of my
own books for review, but if I were called upon to review this
one, I should find it difficult to know how to set about it. It is a
book with an undercurrent; upon the surface, a romance;
underneath, a thesis upon the theme: "All women are Isis, and
Isis is all women," or in the language of modern psychology, the
anima-animus principle.
Various criticisms have been levelled at it by those who have
read it in manuscript, and as they will probably be repeated by
those who read it in print, I may as well take the opportunity of a
preface to deal with them, especially as there is no production-
manager to say to me: "You must cu fifty pages if we are to get it
out at seven-and-six."
It was said by a reviewer of one of my previous books that it is
a pity I make my characters so unlikeable. This was a great
surprise to me, for it had never occurred to me that my
characters were unlikeable. What kind of barber's blocks are
required in order that readers may love them ? In real life no one
escapes the faults of their qualities, so why should they in fiction
?
There are many drawbacks to my hero as a son, a brother, a
husband and a business partner, and he makes no attempt to
In her Introduction, Dion Fortune remarks that "this book has
not got the imprint of any publishing house." This statement
refers to the first edition of The Sea Priestess which was
published privately in England in 1938.
First published in 1978 by
Samuel Weiser, Inc.
Box 612
York Beach. Maine 03910
This printing, 1999
Library of Congress Card Number: 83-159136
ISBN 0-87728-424-5
MY
Printed in the United States of America
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum
requirements of the American National Standard for
Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials Z39.48-
1984.
6 INTRODUCTION
minimise them; nevertheless I retain my affection for him,
though I am quite alive to the fact that he could not compete
with the creations of the late Samuel Smiles. But then I do not
know that I particularly want him to. It has often seemed to me
that as one cannot please everybody, one may as well please
oneself, especially as I have. God be thanked, no publisher to
consider, who would naturally expect my book to contribute its
quota towards his overhead expenses and errors of judgment. It
was said of this book by a publisher's reader, who ought to know
what he is talking about, that the style is uneven, rising to
heights of lyric beauty (his expression, not mine), and on the
same page descending to colloquialisms.
This raises a pretty point in technique. My story is written in
the first person; it is therefore a monologue, and the same rule
applies to it that applies to dialogue--that the speakers must
speak in character. As my hero's mood changes, his narrative
style therefore changes.
Any writer will agree that narrative in the first person is a most
difficult technique to handle. The method of presentation is in
actuality that of drama, though maintaining the appearance of
narrative; moreover everything has to be seen not only through
the eyes, but through the temperament of
the person who is telling the story. A restraint has to be observed
in the emotional passages lest the blight of self-pity appear on
the hero. He must, at all costs, keep the reader's respect while
evoking his sympathy, and this he cannot do if he wallows in his
emotions. Consequently in the most telling scenes, where an
author would normally pull out the tremolo stop and tread on
the loud pedal, only curt, brief Anglo-Saxon may be used, for no
one employs elaborate English when in extremis. All effects have
to be obtained by "noises off". Therefore unless the reader has
imagination and can read constructively, the effects are lost.
INTRODUCTION 7
And this brings me to the question of constructive reading.
Everybody knows how much the audience contributes to the
performance of a play, but few people realise how much a reader
must contribute to the effect of a work of fiction.
Perhaps I ask too much of my readers: that is a point I am not
competent to judge, and can only say with Martin Luther: "God
help me, I can do no otherwise." After all, the style is
the man, and short of castration, cannot be altered. And who
wants to be a literary eunuch? Not me, anyway, which is perhaps
the reason why I have to do my own publishing. People read
fiction in order to supplement the diet life provides for them. If
life is full and varied, they like novels that analyse and interpret
it for them; if life is narrow and unsatisfying, they supply
themselves with mass production wish-fulfilments from the
lending libraries. I have managed to fit my book in between
these two stools so neatly that it is hardly fair to say that it falls
between them. It is a novel of interpretation and a novel of wish-
fulfilment at the same time.
Yet after all, why should not the two be combined? They have
to be in psycho-therapy, where I learnt my trade. The frustration
that afflicts my hero is the lot, in some degree at any rate, of a
very considerable proportion of human beings, as my readers
doubtless can confirm from their own experience. It is too well
known to need emphasis that readers, reading for emotional
compensation, identify themselves with the hero or heroine as
the case may be, and for this reason the writers who cater for
this class of taste invariably make the protagonist of the opposite
sex to themselves the oleographic representation of a wish-
fulfilment. The he-men who write for he-men invariably provide
as heroine either a glutinous, synthetic, saccharine creature and
call the result romance, or else combine all the incompatibles in
the human character and think they have achieved realism.
8 INTRODUCTION
THE SEA PRIESTESS 9
Equally the lady novelist will provide her readers with such
males as never stepped into a pair of trousers; on whom, in fact,
trousers would be wasted.
It is difficult for me to judge of my own characters; naturally I
think the world of them, but such partiality is probably no more
justified than that of any other doting parent. The late Charles
Garvice was convinced he wrote literature and was bitterly
jealous of Kipling.
How far my creations are wish-fulfilments is a matter on which
I am the last person to be able to express an impartial opinion. It
has often been said of me that I am no lady, and I have myself
had to tell the secretary of a well-known club which craved my
membership that I am no gentleman, so we will leave the
mystery of sex wrapped in decent obscurity, like that of the
parrot.
Nevertheless, I think that if readers in their reading will
identify themselves with one or another of the characters
according to taste, they will be led to a curious psychological
experience--the experience of the therapeutic use of phantasy,
an unappreciated aspect of psycho-therapy.
The psychological state of modern civilisation is on a par with
the sanitation of the medieval walled cities. Therefore I lay my
tribute at the feet of the great goddess Cloacina--
CHAPTER I
THE keeping of a diary is usually reckoned a vice in one's
contemporaries though a virtue in one's ancestors. I must plead
guilty to the vice, if vice it is, for I have kept a fairly detailed
journal for a good many years. Loving observation but lacking
imagination, my real role was that of a Boswcll, but alas, no
Johnson has been forthcoming. I am therefore reduced to being
my own Johnson. This is not my choice. I would far rather have
been the chronicler of the great, but the great never came my
way. Therefore it was myself or nothing. I am under no delusion
that my journal is literature, but it served its purpose as a safety-
valve at a time when a safety-valve was badly needed. Without it,
I think I would have blown the lid off on more than one
occasion.
They say that adventures are to the adventurous; but one can
hardly go seeking adventure with persons dependent upon one.
Had I had a young wife to face the adventure of life with
me, it might have been a different story, but my sister was ten
years my senior and my mother an invalid, and the family
business only just enough to keep the three of us during my
salad days. Adventure, therefore, was not for me, save at a risk
to others which I did not feel was justifiable. Hence the need for
a safety-valve.
These old journals, volume upon volume of them, lie in a tin
trunk in the attic. I have dipped into them occasionally,
"In jesting guise, but ye are wise,
Ye know what the jest is worth."
dion fortune
10
THE SEA PRIESTESS
THE SEA PRIESTESS 11
but they are dreary reading; all the pleasure lay in the writing of
them. They are an objective chronicle of things seen through the
eyes of a provincial business man. Very small beer indeed, if I
may be allowed to say so.
But at a certain point there comes a change. The subjective
becomes objective. But where, and exactly how, I cannot say for
certain. It was in an endeavour to elucidate the whole business
that I began to read through the later journals systematically,
and finally to write the whole thing out. It makes a curious story,
and I do not pretend to understand it. I had hoped it would
come clear in the writing, but it has not. In fact it has become
more problematical. Had I not had the diary-keeping habit,
much would have safely disappeared into the limbo of things
forgotten; the mind could then have arranged matters in a
pattern after its own liking, to suit its prc-conceived ideas, and
the incompatibles would have slipped into the discard
unnoticed.
But with things down in black and white, this could not be
done, and the affair had to be faced up to as a whole. I record it
for what it is worth. I am the last person to be able to assess its
value. It appears to me to be a curious chapter in the history of
the mind, and as such, to be of interest as data if not as
literature. If I learn as much from the re-living of it as I learnt
from the living of it, I shall be well repaid.
The whole thing began with a dispute over money matters. Our
business is an estate agent's business which I inherited from my
father. It has always been a good business, but was heavily
embarrassed by speculation. My father had never been able to
resist the temptation to pick up a bargain. If a house which he
knew had cost ten thousand to build were going for two, he had
to have it. But nobody wanted these great sprawling mansions,
so I fell heir to a stablcful of white elephants. All through my
twenties and well into my thirties I
wrestled with these brutes, peddling them piecemeal, till finally
the business assumed a healthy complexion once more and I was
in a position to do what I had long wanted to do--sell it and be
rid of it--for I hated it and the whole life of that dead-alive town-
-and use the money to buy a partnership in a London publishing
company. That, I thought, would give me the entree into the life
that fascinated me; and it did not seem to me a particularly wild-
cat scheme financially, for business is business, whether you are
selling bricks or books. I had read every biography I could lay
my hands on that dealt with the world of books, and it appeared
to me that there was scope for someone accustomed to business
methods. I may be wrong, of course, having no first-hand
experience of books and their makers, but that was how it
looked to me.
So I mooted the idea to my mother and sister. They were not
averse, provided I did not want them to come to London with
me. This was a boon I had never expected, for I had quite
thought I should have to get a house for them, as my mother
would never have put up with a flat. I saw the way opening up
before me in a manner I have never dared even to dream of. I
saw myself leading a bachelor life in Bohemian circles, a club-
man, and God knows what not. And then the blow fell. The
offices of our firm were part of the big old Georgian house in
which we had always lived. You couldn't sell the business
without the premises because it was the best site in the town,
and they wouldn't agree.
I suppose I could have forced it through and sold the house
over their heads, but I didn't like to do that. My sister came up to
my room and talked to me, and told me that it would kill my
mother to have her home broken up. I offered to set them up in
any house they fancied that was within my means, but she said
no, my mother would never settle. Surely I would let her live out
her old age in peace? It couldn't be for long now.
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin