Eric Prie - Queen's Pawn Opening - A White Chameleon.pdf
(
151 KB
)
Pobierz
354226839 UNPDF
Queen’s Pawn Opening
Prié Attack
QP 9.1 (D00)
A White Chameleon
by Eric Prié
1. d4
d5
In all their wisdom, the classics
recommended using the first
move to set foot in the centre and
threaten to put the second pawn
there as well. But is this a univer-
sal law?
After 1.e4 c5 there is the dy-
namic Bezgodov idea 2.a3 and
3.b4 – see his Survey in Year-
book 74 – but this lies outside the
scope of this Survey. The ques-
tion is: can such modest rook
pawn moves be feasible to reach
a good reversed system?
‘Chromatically’, 1.e4 with 2.h3
seems to work well against the
two moves that hinder 2.d4,
1...e5 and 1...c5. Which is nor-
mal, as controlling the f5 and g4
squares hinders the development
of the enemy light-squared
bishop, as we regularly see in the
Ruy Lopez or the Rossolimo
Sicilian...
So what about 1.d4? After 1...d5
2.c4 White must already be pre-
pared for a myriad of black alter-
natives. A highly popular one
nowadays is the Chameleon
(Chebanenko) Variation 4...a6 in
the Slav Defence, which is a use-
ful move that exerts pressure on
c4 without hindering the devel-
opment of Black’s own light-
squared bishop.
Now we reach the esoteric use of
the a-pawn: If 1.e4 goes well
chromatically with 2.h3, the
same may go for 1.d4 with 2.a3
and ...a6, when Black has a pawn
on d5.
2. a3
TsLdMlSt
jJj.jJjJ
._._._._
_._J_._.
._.i._._
i._._._.
.iI_IiIi
rNbQkBnR
One of the greatest mysteries of
the chess game is the practice of
playing with reversed colours.
Why, for instance, when the
Dutch is a ‘living’ defence
against 1.d4 (1.c4, 1.Àf3), is the
Bird Opening 1.f4 a
rara avis
in
master practice, like so many
other reversed systems?
Well, it’s all a question of
rhythm! The opening is a dy-
namic and subtle thing, swinging
harmoniously between action
and reaction. The black player
systematically adapts himself to
what White undertakes, and in
systems with reversed colours
that produce equal positions, the
advantage of the first move will
quickly fade away.
So is there not a single reversable
defence that can serve to break
out of this process? A kind of
remedy for all ailments, hyper-
economical from the viewpoint
of theoretical investment, since it
is based on a Black system?
Eric Prié
Multiple Purposes
Let’s examine the move 2.a3!? in
reply to all Black reactions to
1.d4.
A) 1.d4 Àf6 2.a3?!
TsLdMl.t
jJjJjJjJ
._._.s._
_._._._.
._.i._._
i._._._.
.iI_IiIi
rNbQkBnR
2...e6 3.c4 c5 4.Àf3 is pleasant
for White. He intends Àc3 and
e4 to play against a Hedgehog
system in which the critical line
1.d4 Àf6 2.Àf3 c5 3.c4 cd4
4.Àd4 e5!? is avoided. In the line
2...e6 3.c4, 3...b6 4.Àc3 would
207
be an improved version of the
Petrosian Variation of the
Queen’s Indian, where White
avoids the Bogo-Indian 1.d4
Àf6 2.c4 e6 3.Àf3 Ãb4 as well
as 1.d4 e6 2.c4 Ãb4 and the
move ...Ãa6, while at the same
time he keeps his king’s knight
flexible. The problem is, how-
ever, Black’s reply 2...g6! or
2...d6 since against black
squares set-ups, the control of
the b4 square is generally of
lesser importance, and White
usually does not have to support
his b-pawn with a2-a3 if he
wants to advance it two squares,
like in the Bayonet Attack of the
King’s Indian or the main line of
the Old Indian.
B) 1.d4 e6 2.a3!
Black’s light-squared bishop is
already locked inside its pawn
chain;
B4) 2...f5 3.c4 Àf6 4.Àc3
Ãe7?! (Black should really
transpose to the English Defence
with 4...b6 5.Àf3 Ãb7) 5.©c2!
(opening the attack on the light
squares without having to fear a
check on b4; on 5.Àf3 Àe4!? is
an interesting possibility)
Black’s other main line is
3...Àf6 4.Ãg5 Ãe7 (4...c5 5.c3;
4...h6! 5.Ãf4 Ãd6) 5.e3 h6
6.Ãf4 0-0 7.Àbd2 b6 (7...Àh5
8.Ãe5 Àd7 9.g4) 8.Àe5 Ãb7,
Prié-D.Adams 2004/05, and
now 9.h4!.
C2) 2...Ãf5 3.c4 e6 4.Àc3 c6
(2...Ãf5!? 3.c4 e6 4.cd5!? ed5
5.©b3 Àc6 6.Àf3 Àa5 7.©a4 c6
8.e3!?, a5Ø) 5.Àf3 Àd7 (5...Àf6
6.©b3 ©b6 7.©a2 Àe4) 6.Ãf4,
transposing into C65;
C3) 2...a6!? 3.Ãg5!? h6 4.Ãh4
c6 5.e3 ©b6 6.©c1 (preferable
to 6.Õa2), eliminating the criti-
cal idea 6...e5? 7.de5, as the
black queen has no check on h4
now!
C4) 2...h6. This is not the
counterpart of 2.a3. At the very
least, White is playing an im-
proved London system with c4,
for instance 3.Àf3 and now:
C41) 3...Ãf5? 4.c4!, and now
4...c6? is no good because of
5.cd5. Now, after 5...Ãb1 6.Õb1
©d5 White has the equivalent of
an advantage of two tempos, as
the a2-pawn is not hanging and
White can move the queen to the
best square at once with 7.©c2!.
e2-e4 is threatened and there are
concrete problems cropping up
for Black: 7...Àf6 8.e3 threaten-
ing Ãc4, Àe5 or Ãd3 and e4, and
sometimes b4, which can be in-
terposed to provoke ...a6.
On 5...cd5, White plays 6.©b3;
or 4...e6? 5.©b3 (no point in ex-
changing on d5 first when the
black queen cannot go to b6)
5...Àc6 6.©b7ê, as Black no
longer has ...Ãb4 anymore, e.g.
6...Àa5 7.©a6 Àc4 8.©c6.
After 4...dc4 5.Àc3 Àf6 6.e3,
White wins back the pawn in a
considerably improved version of
the QGA or a Slav in which
White has played a3 instead of al-
lowing a weakness on b4 with a4.
C42) 3...Àf6 4.Ãf4 c5?! (the
thematic reaction; 4...Àc6 was a
TsLdM_.t
jJjJl.jJ
._._Js._
_._._J_.
._Ii._._
i.n._._.
.iQ_IiIi
r.b.kBnR
5...0-0 6.Àf3 d5 (e2-e4 was
coming) 7.Ãf4, with a
‘Trashcan-Stonewall’ with
White’s bishop outside the pawn
chain – Game 2.
TsLdMlSt
jJjJ_JjJ
._._J_._
_._._._.
._.i._._
i._._._.
.iI_IiIi
rNbQkBnR
The move 1...e6 is a multi-
ple-purpose one, avoiding the
Trompowsky and keeping many
options open. But now 2.a3! is
very useful, as White can play
c2-c4 without allowing ...Ãb4,
and e2-e4 is not ruled out yet.
B1) 2...b6?! 3.e4 Ãb7 4.Àc3 is
the best line for White in any
case in the English Defence;
B2) 2...Àf6 3.Àf3, with the
idea of c2-c3, and Ãg5, probably
transposing to the Torre-
Trompowsky Attack or 3.Ãg5
c5 4.dc5 Ãc5 5.e3, which is how
Antoaneta Stefanova plays the
Trompowsky with 2...c5, see
Game 1;
B3) 2...c5 3.c3, possibly fol-
lowed by b2-b4; this is the Re-
versed Chameleon, but here
The Prié Attack Proper
The real Prié Attack is intro-
duced when Black plays 1...d5,
so:
C) 1.d4 d5 2.a3.
C1) 2...e6 3.Àf3 (Games 3-9),
and now:
Black’s first main possibility is
3...c5 4.c3 Àc6 5.Ãf4 Àf6
(5...©b6? was Prié-Flear, Mar-
seille 2005, and now, with 6.b4!,
White realized the Prié idea most
powerfully, which also features
in the ‘regular’ Slav Chame-
leon!) 6.e3 Ãd6. Now Prié-
Flear, Narbonne 2005, went
7.Ãg3 0-0 8.Àbd2 a6 9.Ãd3
Õe8 10.Àe5 Ãe5 11.de5 Àd7
12.©g4!? Àde5 13.Ãe5 Àe5
14.Ãh7 ®h7 15.©h5 ®g8
16.©e5 f6, and Black has the
centre and a strong bishop, but
his king remains exposed. Yet to-
day I would prefer 7.Ãd6!? ©d6
8.Àbd2 0-0 9.b4 b6 10.Ãb5.
208
TsLdM_.t
jJjJl.jJ
._._Js._
_._._J_.
._Ii._._
i.n._._.
.iQ_IiIi
r.b.kBnR
TsLdMlSt
jJjJ_JjJ
._._J_._
_._._._.
._.i._._
i._._._.
.iI_IiIi
rNbQkBnR
Survey QP 9.1
rapid game Prié-Hamdouchi,
where 5.e3 g5 6.Ãg3 Àe4 7.Ãb5
Àg3 8.hg3 Ãg7 9.Àe5 ©d6 was
interesting, but Black lost be-
cause his position contained too
many holes) 5.Ãb8 Õb8 6.dc5,
and Black will not see his pawn
back;
C5) 2...e5? 3.de5 Àc6 4.e4
(Prié-Guadalpi, 2004, Game
13). A gigantic advantage on the
clock in a reversed Lemberg
Variation, and soon a large ad-
vantage instead of pleasant
equality with reversed colours.
C6) 2...Àf6 3.Àf3, and now:
C61) 3...g6 4.c3 Ãg7 5.Ãf4
There is a game Shipov-Volkov,
Moscow 1996 (Game 14), in
which Black took on the same
set-up as White in our line, with
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Àf3 Àf6
4.Àc3 a6 5.g3 Ãf5!?, and won. It
was analysed in Glenn Flear’s
book on the Slav Chameleon.
With a similar set-up (in various
move orders) I myself have won
several games with Black.
C62) 3...a6!? (this seems more
accurate than 2...a6) 4.Ãf4
(4.Ãg5 Àe4 5.Ãf4 Ãf5 6.Àbd2
e6ì) 4...Ãf5 5.e3 e6 6.c4 (with
the move 2.a3 White has avoided
...Ãb1, followed by Ãb4)
6...c5!? 7.dc5! Ãc5 8.Àc3 Àc6
9.cd5 Àd5 10.Àd5 ed5 11.Õc1
Ãb6 12.Ãd3 Ãg4 13.0-0 0-0
14.b4, with advantage for White;
this is miraculously similar to
Dorfman-Vaisser, Aix-les-Bains
2003, and Leko-Kramnik,
Brissago 2004 – Games 15-16!
C63) 3...Ãf5?! (Game 12)
4.c4! c6 5.cd5! cd5 6.©b3 ©b6
7.©b6 ab6 8.Àc3 Àc6 9.Ãf4 e6
10.e3, with a pleasant advantage
for White (Prié-Kahler). The
b-pawns are doubled and iso-
lated, Black has abandoned
square b5 and White’s bishop is
outside the pawn chain. All these
factors will make White happy in
the
of playing c7-c5 more quickly
and possibly recapture on c5
with the knight) 4.Ãf4 g6 5.h3
Ãg7 6.e3 0-0 7.Àbd2 (Prié-
Flear, Lattes 2005) 7...b6!? 8.c3
Ãb7 9.©b3! Àe4 10.Õd1!, con-
trolling e5. White loses two
tempi with a3 and h3. This en-
ables him to develop freely but is
too slow for a real advantage;
C65) 3...c6. The prophylactic
move which will allow Black to
equalize without specific prob-
lems by allowing the natural de-
velopment of his queen’s bishop
out of the pawn chain. What is
White able to gain out of the ope-
ning then? This is what we shall
see in the next issue!
TsLdM_.t
jJj.jJlJ
._._.sJ_
_._J_._.
._.i.b._
i.i._N_.
.i._IiIi
rN_QkB_R
Conclusion
The Prié Attack with 1.d4 and
2.a3 is applicable against all
Black replies on the first move,
except maybe for 1...Àf6, after
which a White 2.a3 serves no
real purpose after 2...g6!. And
the set-up with 2…Àf6 and
3…c6, which we shall deal with
in the next Survey, also seems
perfectly viable for Black. In all
other cases, this modest little
move is quite useful, and not
only to gain time on the clock!
For those who like an uncom-
mon strategic struggle, this ope-
ning holds plenty more than just
surprise value.
The combination of g6 and d5 is
dubious as the fianchettoed
bishop is biting on the granite of
an enemy pawn wall. It’s not a
Closed Catalan, where Black’s
queen’s bishop is locked inside
the pawn chain and cannot con-
tribute to the important control
of square e4 (Games 10-11).
endgame
(10...Àh5?
11.Ãc7);
C64) 3...Àbd7 (with the idea
Multiple Purposes
1.d4 & 2.a3
T_LdMs.t
jJ_Sl._.
._._J_._
_._J_Jj.
._Ji._._
i.i.iNb.
.iBn._Ii
r._Qk._R
14.a4?!
[14.0-0 Àg6 15.e4 de4 16.Àe4
fe4 17.Ãe4Å Àf4 18.Àg5 (18.Ãf4 gf4
19.Ãg6 ®f8 20.©e2 Ãf6 21.Àe5 Ãe5
22.de5 Õh4 23.g3 ©g5 24.®h1) 18...Ãg5
19.Ãf4 Ãf4 20.Ãg6 ®e7 21.Õf4 ©b6º]
14...Àg6 15.e4 de4 16.Àe4 fe4
17.Ãe4 Àf4 18.Ãf4 gf4 19.Ãg6
®f8 20.©e2 Ãh4 21.g3 Ãg3
22.®d2 Ãh4 23.Õaf1 ©b6 24.®c1
Ãf6 25.Àd2 Õh4 26.Õhg1 ©c6
27.Ãe4? ©a4 28.©g2 ®e7 29.Àf3
Õh8 30.Àe5 Ãe5 31.de5 ®d8
209
Prié,Eric
1
Rustemov,Alexander
Bastia rapid 2004 (3)
1.d4 e6 2.a3 Àf6 3.Ãg5 d5 4.e3
Ãe7 5.Àd2 Àbd7 6.f4 c5 7.c3 h6
8.Ãh4 g5! 9.fg5 Àh7 10.Àgf3 hg5
11.Ãg3 Àhf8 12.Ãd3 c4 13.Ãc2 f5
32.Õf4 ©b5 33.Õf7 ®c7 34.Õd1
Õd8 35.©g7 a5 36.h4 Õa6 37.h5 ...
[The rest of the game score is missing.
White played a reversed Stonewall – which I
haven’t played since because of the present
game – with the bishop outside the pawn
chain, allowing the sharp reaction 7...h6
8.Ãh4 g5! 9.fg5 Àh7. This was a wild
game in which 2.a3 proved useless]
0-1
12.0-0-0
[Slightly optimistic. Simpler was
12.Õf1!]
12...Àf2 13.g5 Àg4 14.Àh4
Àh6 15.Àf3
[15.Àg6!? Àg4 16.Àe5
(better was 16.©d2 hg6 17.h3 Àe3
18.©e3 c5!º) 16...Àe3 17.©e2 Àd1
18.©h5 ©e7 19.g6 (19.Õd1 Àd7)
19...h6!º 20.Àf7 (20.Õd1 ©g5) 20...Àc3
21.©h6 Àa2 22.®b1 ©f6 23.©h7 ®f8
24.Àd6 Õe7 25.©h6 ©g7î]
15...Àg4
[15...Àf7 16.h4]
16.©d2 e5 17.h3
Àe3
[17...ed4 18.hg4 dc3 19.©c3 Õe3
20.Õh7! d4 21.Àd4 ®h7 22.Õh1 ®g8
23.Õh8! ®h8 24.Àf5 ®g8 25.©g7X]
18.©e3 e4 19.Õde1! Ãe6?
[19...Õf8
20.cd5 cd5 21.Ãc2 f4 22.©f2 ef3 23.Õe5;
19...Õe6!? (Fritz) 20.h4 with interesting
compensation for the pawn]
20.cd5 Ãf7
[20...cd5 21.Ãb5]
21.Ãe4 fe4 22.Àe5
[22.Àe4! Àd7 (22...®g7 23.d6 Ãd5
24.Àfd2) 23.dc6 bc6 24.Àe5]
22...Ãd5
[22...cd5 23.h4 Àc6 24.Àf7 ®f7 25.h5]
23.h4 Àd7 24.Àg4 ©e7 25.h5 gh5
26.Õh5 Õf8 27.g6! hg6 28.Õh6
©g7
[28...®g7 29.Õg6 ®g6 30.©h6
®f7 31.©h5 ®g7 32.Àe3 ©f7 33.Õg1
®f6 34.Õf1 ®g7 35.Àf5 ©f5 36.Õf5å]
29.Õeh1 Õf3 30.©g5 Õf5
[30...Ãf7
31.Àe4]
31.Õh8
attacking a5; 19...Õc8? 20.Àe7]
20.Õfe1!
Õe8 21.e4! de4
[21...b3 22.©c3 de4
23.d5 ©d5 24.Õed1 ©c6 (24...©e6
25.Õd7! ©d7 26.©c4) 25.©c6 Õc6 26.Õc6
Àe5 27.Õb6]
22.Õe4
[‘!’]
22...©e4
23.©c4 Õe6 24.©a6 h5 25.©b7
[25.©a5 Õc6 26.©a8 Àb8 27.©b8 ®h7
28.Õc6 ©c6 29.©b4ê]
25...Àf8
[25...h4
26.©d7 hg3 27.Àe5! gf2 28.®f1]
Prié,Eric
2
._._.sM_
_Q_._.j.
._N_Tj._
j._._._J
Ij.iD_._
_._._.i.
.i._.iI_
_.r._.k.
Baruch,Andrew
England tt-2 2004/05 (4)
1.d4 e6 2.a3 f5 3.c4 Àf6 4.Àc3 Ãe7
[4...d5 5.Ãf4 (a typical Trashcan Stonewall for
Black, with White’s queen’s bishop outside its
pawn chain. White should obviously play c2-c4
and develop the queen to c2, eyeing f5 and
the c-file, all possible because after 2.a3
White controls square b4. White has
postponed Àf3 as it may be more useful to
play f2-f3 and Àge2, in case a black knight
appears on e4) 5...Ãd6 6.Ãd6 ©d6 7.e3å]
5.©c2! d5 6.Ãf4
[Leaving the knight on
g1 for the moment also gives White the extra
option, in case of an exchange on d6, of first
f2-f4 and then Àf3 and possibly c4-c5!?. It
amazes me that in such positions, many white
players (1500 to 40 according to my
database) prefer g2-g3 above Ãf4, to hinder
the development of the black queen’s bishop
on the long diagonal, even when Black has
already committed himself to 4...d5 instead of
4...Ãb4. Moreover, in the Stonewall with
g3-Ãg2, the white queen’s knight is often
automatically developed to c3, where it exerts
no pressure whatsoever on Black’s position]
6...c6 7.e3 0-0 8.Ãd3 g6
[8...Àbd7
9.cd5! cd5 (9...Àd5 10.Àd5 ed5 11.Ãf5
©a5 12.®f1ê Õf5 13.©f5 ©b5 14.Àe2
©b2 15.©b1) 10.Àb5 ©a5 11.©d2]
9.Àf3 Àe4 10.Ãh6 Õe8 11.g4! Ãh4
26.Àd8! h4?
[27.©f7ê; 26...©b7
27.Àb7 Õe2 28.b3 Õd2 29.Àa5 Àe6
30.Àc6 Àd4 31.Àd4 Õd4 32.a5! Õd6
(32...Õd3 33.a6 Õb3 34.Õa1) 33.®f1 ®f7
34.®e2 ®e6 35.Õc5 g6 36.Õb5 Õa6
37.Õb6]
1-0
1-0
Prié,Eric
4
Prié Attack Proper
1.d4 d5 2.a3
Apicella,Manuel
France tt 2005 (3)
1.d4 e6 2.a3 d5 3.Àf3 Àf6 4.Ãg5
Ãe7 5.e3 0-0 6.Àbd2 Àbd7 7.Ãd3
b6 8.c3 Ãb7 9.©b1 h6 10.Ãf4 c5
11.h3 a6 12.b4 ©c8 13.0-0 c4
14.Ãc2 ©c6 15.a4 b5 16.a5 Àe4
17.Àe4 de4 18.Àe5 Àe5 19.Ãe5
Ãg5 20.Õa2 f6 21.Ãg3 f5 22.Ãe5
f4 23.ef4 Ãf4 24.Ãf4 Õf4 25.©c1
Õaf8 26.©e3 ©d5 27.Ãd1 ©g5
28.Õe2 ©g6 29.Õee1 Ãd5 30.©g3
©f6 31.©e3 ©g6 32.©g3 ©f6
33.©e3 ®h8 34.©d2 Ãc6 35.Õe3
e5 36.de5 ©e5 37.Ãc2 ©f6
38.©e1 Ãb7 39.Ãd1
[2.a3 has served
to support the 12.b4 push here]
Prié,Eric
3
Sharif,Mehrshad
France tt 2004 (10)
1.d4 e6 2.a3
[This move is absolutely
logical after Black’s compromising 1...e6,
which closes in his light-squared bishop. The
motif of playing c2-c4 without allowing a
bishop on b4 gave me the ‘Prié idea’]
2...d5
[2...b6 3.e4 Ãb7 4.Àc3; 2...c5 3.c3; 2...Àf6
3.c4 c5 (3...b6 4.Àc3 Ãb7 5.©c2) 4.Àf3
cd4 (4...d5 5.dc5 Ãc5 6.e3) 5.Àd4 Àc6
6.Àc3 ©b6? 7.Àdb5 d5 8.Ãe3]
3.Àf3
Àf6 4.Ãg5 Ãe7 5.e3 b6 6.c4 0-0
7.cd5 ed5 8.Àc3 a5 9.©c2 Ãa6
10.Ãa6 Õa6 11.0-0 c6 12.Àe5 b5
[12...Àfd7 13.Ãe7 ©e7 14.Àc6!! Àc6
15.Àd5 ©d6 16.©c6!]
13.a4 b4 14.Àe2
Àe4 15.Ãe7 ©e7 16.Àg3 Àg3
17.hg3 Àd7 18.Àc6!
[18.Àd7 ©d7
19.b3å]
18...©e6 19.Õac1 f6
[19...®h8
20.Àe5 Àe5 21.de5 ©e5 22.Õfd1å;
22.Õfd1 Õh6 23.Õd4å; 19...b3 20.©c3
TsLdT_M_
jJ_._._J
._J_J_Jb
_._J_J_.
._IiS_Il
i.nBiN_.
.iQ_.i.i
r._.k._R
½-½
Prié,Eric
5
Pons Carreras,David
Catalunya tt-2 2005 (7)
1.d4 e6 2.a3 d5 3.Àf3 Àf6 4.Ãg5
Ãe7 5.e3 Àbd7 6.c4 Àe4 7.Ãe7
©e7 8.Àbd2
[8.Ãd3]
8...Àd2 9.©d2
0-0 10.Õc1 c6 11.©a5 Õe8
[11...b6
210
Survey QP 9.1
12.©a4]
12.Ãe2?!
[12.©c7 dc4
13.Ãc4 e5 14.d5 cd5 15.Ãd5 e4 16.Àd2
(16.Àd4 ©g5) 16...Àf6 17.©e7 Õe7
18.Ãb3Ç]
12...dc4 13.Ãc4 b6
14.©c3 Ãb7 15.0-0 c5 16.dc5 Àc5
17.b4 Àe4 18.©b2 Õac8 19.Õfd1
Õed8 20.Õd8 ©d8 21.Ãe2 Õc1
22.©c1 ©c8 23.©c8 Ãc8 24.Àd4
Ãd7 25.Ãd3 Àd6 26.f4 f6 27.®f2
®f7 28.®e1 h6 29.®d2 e5 30.Àe2
®e6 31.Àc3 Ãc6 32.g3 g5 33.Ãe2
Àe4
[Control of the b4 square has its
points after having played c2-c4, leaving the
a5-e1 diagonal open]
[2.a3 has permitted White to make the
surprising recapture towards the centre
c3xd4!, because the b4-square was under
control]
½-½
20.©h7 ®f8 21.©h8X]
18.Ãh6 ©e5
19.Ãg5 f5
[19...g6 20.Ãg6 fg6 21.©g6
Ãg7 (21...©g7 22.©e6 ®h7 23.Ãd8)
22.Ãf6]
20.Àf3
[20.Ãd8 Õd8 21.Àf3
©f6 22.Õg6 also wins]
20...©d6
21.Ãd8 Àd8 22.Àg5 Ãe7 23.©h7
[2.a3 has been useful because it delayed a
black counter on the queenside with ...c4
and ...b5 and especially as it allowed, if
necessary, the recapture toward the centre
with square b4 firmly under control]
1-0
Prié,Eric
7
Adams,David
England tt-2 2004/05 (10)
1.d4 d5 2.a3 e6 3.Àf3 Àf6 4.Ãg5
[If
one has grasped the spirit of the concept,
White now plays against a black Colle,
which is always pleasant, with or without
a2-a3!]
4...Ãe7
[4...c5 5.c3; 4...h6 was
better, with the idea 5.Ãf4 Ãd6]
5.e3 h6
6.Ãf4 0-0?!
[6...Àh5 7.Ãe5 Àd7 8.c4
(watch out for the knight on h5!) 8...Àe5
9.de5 dc4? 10.©d8 Ãd8 11.g4ê]
7.Àbd2 b6
[7...Àh5 8.Ãe5 Àd7 9.g4!]
8.Àe5!
[Signalling the attack. Black cannot
afford to play f7-f6 on account of the hole
on g6]
8...Ãb7
½-½
Prié,Eric
8
Prié,Eric
6
Flear,Glenn
Narbonne-Plage rapid 2005 (5)
1.d4 d5 2.a3
[The great test against the
GM 1...d5 expert]
2...e6 3.Àf3 c5 4.c3
Àc6 5.Ãf4 Àf6 6.e3 Ãd6 7.Ãg3
[7.Ãd6!? ©d6 8.Àbd2 0-0 9.b4 b6
10.Ãb5]
7...0-0 8.Àbd2 a6
[8...Õe8
9.b4! b6 10.Ãb5 Ãb7 11.©a4]
9.Ãd3
[9.b4!? b6 10.Ãd3 Õe8 11.dc5 (11.0-0?!
Ãg3 12.hg3 e5 13.b5 Àd4! 14.cd4 e4)
11...bc5 12.e4]
9...Õe8 10.Àe5 Ãe5
11.de5 Àd7 12.©g4
[This is the idea
behind White’s last five moves, but if I had
to do it again, I would have chosen the
alternative given after White’s 7th move;
12.f4? c4 13.Ãc2 ©b6]
12...Àde5
13.Ãe5 Àe5 14.Ãh7 ®h7 15.©h5
®g8 16.©e5 f6 17.©h5 e5 18.0-0
Ãe6
[18...e4!? (Flear) 19.c4 d4? 20.©c5]
19.e4 ©d7 20.Õfe1 ©f7 21.©h4
Dobrev,Nanko
San Sebastian 2005 (7)
1.d4 d5 2.a3 Àf6 3.Àf3 e6 4.Ãg5
Ãe7 5.e3 h6 6.Ãh4
[6.Ãf4!]
6...0-0
7.Àbd2 b6 8.Àe5 c5 9.c3 Àfd7
10.Àd7 Àd7 11.Ãg3 cd4 12.cd4
a5 13.Õc1 Õa7 14.Ãb5 Àf6
15.0-0?!
[15.©c2 (to prevent 15...Àe8!)
15...Ãa6 16.Ãa6 Õa6 17.©c7 with a not
so large but very pleasant advantage!]
15...Àe8! 16.Àf3 Àd6 17.Ãd3 Õc7
18.Àe5 Ãd7 19.©g4 Ãe8 20.©e2
[20.Ãf4 f5 21.©h3 with the idea of f3 and
g4]
20...b5 21.Õc7 ©c7 22.©d2 a4
23.Àf3 ©b7 24.Ãd6 Ãd6 25.Õc1
©b8 26.g3 Ãd7 27.©a5 f6 28.e4
Õf7 29.ed5 ed5 30.Àh4 f5 31.Àg6
®h7 32.Àh4 g5 33.Àf3 g4 34.Àh4
®g7 35.©d2 b4 36.ab4 ©b4
37.©b4 Ãb4 38.Õc7 f4
Ts.d.tM_
jLj.lJj.
.j._Js.j
_._Jn._.
._.i.b._
i._.i._.
.iIn.iIi
r._QkB_R
9.©f3
[White wants to attack with his
pieces. Maybe 9.h4 would have been more
accurate, to attack with the pawns
immediately. The control of square e4 does
not seem important when the white bishop
is not yet on d3]
9...c5 10.c3 a5
[Another important tempo lost]
11.h4!
Àfd7 12.Ãd3
[12.Ãh6 Àe5 13.de5 gh6
14.©g4 ®h8 15.©h5 ®g7 does not yield
more than a draw by repetition, since
16.Õh3? Õh8 17.Õf3 ©e8 18.Õg3 ®f8
19.©g4 Ãd8 allows the black king to
escape]
12...Àc6 13.Õh3! Àde5
[13...f6 14.Àc6 Ãc6 15.Ãh6]
14.de5
©c7 15.©h5
[It’s always nice to see
when Fritz quickly switches from a black to
a white advantage when the mating attack
appears on its horizon]
15...Ãa6
16.Ãc2 Õfd8
[16...Õfe8 was a tad
better: 17.Õg3 Ãf8 18.©h6 g6 19.©g5]
17.Õg3 Ãf8
[17...®f8 18.Õg7! (there’s
no escape!) 18...®g7 19.©h6 ®g8
T_._T_M_
_J_._Dj.
J_._Lj._
_.jJj._.
._._I_.q
i.i._._.
.i.n.iIi
r._.r.k.
._._._._
_.rL_Tm.
._._._.j
_._J_._.
Jl.i.jJn
_._B_.i.
.i._.i.i
_._._.k.
21...©g6
[A dubious plan, I think. Closing
the centre with d5-d4 was preferable,
although White will attack with f2-f4]
22.Õe3
[22.f4 de4 23.Àe4 Ãd5 24.Àg3
ef4 25.©f4 ©c2 26.©f2 ©f2 27.®f2=]
22...®f7?
[22...d4 23.Õg3 ©f7;
23...©h7 24.©f6]
23.ed5 Ãd5 24.Õg3
[Now White obtains a strong attack]
24...©f5?
[24...Õh8 (Flear) 25.©a4 ©f5
26.Àc4 ©e6 27.Àe3 Ãc6 28.©c2 g5!º;
211
39.gf4?
[39.Ãg6!! Ãd6 (39...Õe7 40.Ãf5
Õe1 41.®g2 f3 42.Àf3 gf3 43.®f3)
40.Õb7 Õe7 41.Ãf5 Ãe8 42.Õe7 Ãe7
43.Ãg4å]
39...Ãd6 40.Àf5?
[40.Õb7
Ãf4 41.Ãg6 Õe7 42.Ãf5 Ãg5 43.Àg6
Õe1 44.®g2 ®f6 45.Ãd7 ®g6 46.Ãa4Ç]
40...Ãf5 41.Õf7 ®f7 42.Ãf5 Ãf4
Plik z chomika:
andzinus
Inne pliki z tego folderu:
Chess Opening Essentials Volume 1-The Complete 1.e4 - Stefan Djuric, Dimitri Komarov, Claudio Pantaleoni, 2007.pdf
(29893 KB)
Chess Opening Essentials Volume 4-1.c4 Minor system - Stefan Djuric, Dimitri Komarov, Claudio Pantaleoni, 2010.pdf
(32952 KB)
Chess Opening Essentials Volume 3-Indian Defences, Complete - Stefan Djuric, Dimitri Komarov, Claudio Pantaleoni, 2009.pdf
(44328 KB)
Chess Opening Essentials Volume 2-1.d4 d5 Queen's Gambits - Stefan Djuric, Dimitri Komarov, Claudio Pantaleoni, 2009.pdf
(36569 KB)
Djuric - Chess Opening Essentials Vol4.pdf
(169251 KB)
Inne foldery tego chomika:
__atak Torre
__debiut 4 skoczków
__debiut Colle
__debiut gońca
__debiut Groba
Zgłoś jeśli
naruszono regulamin