CVO_017.pdf

(914 KB) Pobierz
No. 17, April 29, 2009
OPENINGS
WHAT’S HOT AND WHAT’S NOT?
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+L+K+R+0
9ZPPWQ-SNP+-0
9-+N+P+-+0
9+-+PZP-+-0
9-+-+-ZP-+0
9ZP-ZPQ+-+-0
9-+P+N+PZP0
9TR-VL-MKL+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
The return of the
French Winawer
By IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris
Frequency
We have another look at the Grand Prix Tournament
in Nalchik, won by Levon Aronian today. Some very
interesting theoretical developments have taken place,
which are not just limited to the 1.e4 e5 and 1.d4 ield.
WHAT’S HOT?
Perhaps the biggest news of the week was that the Petroff has been put
under heavy pressure in Nalchik. Leko scored two impressive attacking
wins against it. On the other hand Black looked more convincing in the
Marshall than he did a week ago. Against the Breyer, White has found
a new way of playing that would have certainly been dismissed as anti-
positional in the old days (see Grischuk-Kamsky below).
Score
Karjakin-Ivanchuk was all played before, but it does nicely sum up the
current status of the main line Sveshnikov. Mamedyarov didn t get away
with playing the Sicilian Paulsen/Taimanov hybrid a second time against
Bacrot.
In our Game of the Week we finally got to know what Kamsky had most
likely prepared for his match against Topalov. Unfortunately he just keeps
losing the good positions he gets. In the diagram position he played 12...
d4!?, whereas 12...¤f5!? is another tricky line and 12...¥d7 tranposes to
the main line.
Svidler improved upon his earlier Chebanenko Slav to equalize with
Black. While our Opening Expert Gelfand brought a strong novelty in the
Anti-Moscow Gambit, Aronian was suffering in the Meran (see below).
Source: Megabase + TWIC, 2500+ only
Sergey Karjakin would have been a serious contender for tournament victory if he didn’t score a disastrous 0 out of 3 with the Najdorf.
Alekseev quickly got the pair of bishops with the tricky 6.h3!?. After 6.¥e3 Karjakin usually
plays the main line 6...e5, but in Nalchik he consistenly played 6...Ng4. It’s safe to say that
10...¤f6 is out of business, but Black isn’t out of the woods after 10...¤e5 11.¤f5 either.
WHAT’S NOT?
1 of 4
788960167.051.png 788960167.062.png 788960167.064.png 788960167.065.png 788960167.001.png 788960167.002.png 788960167.003.png 788960167.004.png 788960167.005.png 788960167.006.png 788960167.007.png 788960167.008.png 788960167.009.png 788960167.010.png 788960167.011.png 788960167.012.png 788960167.013.png 788960167.014.png 788960167.015.png 788960167.016.png 788960167.017.png 788960167.018.png 788960167.019.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 17, April 29, 2009
Kamsky reveals his preparation against 3.¤c3
During a 2001 training session Arne Moll and Merijn van Delft concluded: Black never plays
7...£c7 (or 7...cxd4) anymore at top level, but if he does, he wins (e.g. Svidler-Ivanchuk, Linares
1999). Although Karjakin beat Kamsky, we were strongly reminded of our old rule of thumb.
XIIIIIIIIY
9-MK-+-TRR+0
9ZPP+-SN-+-0
9-WQLSNP+-+0
9+-+NZP-+-0
9-+-ZP-ZP-+0
9ZP-ZPQ+L+-0
9-+P+-+PZP0
9TR-VL-+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
GAME OF THE WEEK
Karjakin, S (2721) - Kamsky, G (2720)
4th FIDE GP Nalchik, April 22, 2009
C18, French, Winawer
24.¦xg4 ¤f3+ 25.¦xf3 ¥xf3 fails to 26.£g1!;
23...¥e4? 24.¥e3!; 23...¦d7?! 24.¥e3 ¦gd8
25.¥xd4 ¦xd4 26.¦gd3± and too many pieces
will be exchanged. 23...¥b5? is bad in view of
24.£g2) 24.¥b2 (the point of Black s last move
becomes clear after 24.¥e3? because now
24...¤f3+ is possible, since White doesn t have
¥xa7 with check anymore) 24...¥e4 25.h3 ¦d7
and here White has 26.¦g1! ¤f3+ 27.¦xf3 £xf3
28.£xf3 ¥xf3 29.¥d3 and while he can t readily
push his pawns after 29...¦h8 White does look
better after 30.¦g3.
13...¥d7 14.¥e2
Another interesting idea is the immediate
14.¤e4 0–0–0 15.¤d6+ (15.¦b1 ¤xe5! is a
typical sacrifice giving Black a pawn steamroller)
15...¢b8 16.¦b1 ¥c8 17.¤xf7 ¦df8 18.¤d6
which leads to double-edged play.
14...0–0–0
An old game from the pre-computer era went
14...¤f5 15.¤xf5 exf5 16.¥f3 0–0–0 17.0–0 f6
18.exf6 ¦gf8 19.¦b1 ¦xf6 20.a4 £a5 21.£b5
£c7 22.£d3 £a5 ½–½ Matanovic-Ivkov,
Beverwijk 1963.
15.0–0
Possibly 15.¦b1 was stronger, preventing
Black s next move.
15...£b6! 16.¤e4 ¤d5!
Usually the ¤ goes to f5, but here it doesn t
work for concrete reasons. 16...¤f5 17.g4! ¤ce7
18.¢f2! ¤h4 19.a4 and White is totally in control.
17.¤d6+ ¢b8 18.¤xf7 ¦df8 19.¤d6 ¤ce7
20.¥f3 ¥c6
Around this point both players had only two
minutes left. From a pure chess point of view not
the most interesting stage of the game, because
both players committed some serious errors,
but even more so from a sportive point of view!
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.¤c3
This is the most critical line against the French,
but it does allow:
3...¥b4
The sharp Winawer variation.
4.e5 c5 5.a3 ¥xc3+ 6.bxc3 ¤e7 7.£g4 cxd4
The text move (or 7...£c7 which usually
transposes) is the dangerous gambit option,
already played by Botvinnik in 1935. Only in the
1980s Black started playing 7...0–0 more often.
8.£xg7 ¦g8 9.£xh7 £c7 10.¤e2 ¤bc6 11.f4
11.cxd4? allows 11...¤xd4.
11...dxc3 12.£d3 d4!?
The main line is 12...¥d7 after which White can
take on c3 both ways, play 13.¦b1 (or even
13.¦g1!?). 12...¤f5!? is a speciality of Simon
Williams. Another tricky line with many hidden
secrets. We suggest the solid 13.¤g3.
13.¤g3
Of course, the critical test of Black s setup is
accepting the pawn, resulting in the following
long sequence: 13.¤xd4 ¤xd4 14.£xd4 ¥d7
15.¦g1 ¤f5 16.£f2 £c6 17.¥d3 £d5 18.¦b1
¥c6 19.¦b3 0–0–0 20.¦xc3 ¢b8 21.g4 ¤d4
22.¦g3 £h1+ 23.¥f1!?
XIIIIIIIIY
9-MK-TR-+R+0
9ZPP+-+P+-0
9-+L+P+-+0
9+-+-ZP-+-0
9-+-SN-ZPP+0
9ZP-TR-+-TR-0
9-+P+-WQ-ZP0
9+-VL-MKL+Q0
XIIIIIIIIY
An important moment for the evaluation of 12...
d4!?. White has two pawns, but finds himself
under immense pressure. Since direct attempts
to punish White for his lack in development
fail, Black needs to stay calm and first take
prophylactical measures. 23...¢a8 (23...¦xg4?
Rybka found an amazing drawing line: 21.g3
¤xf4 22.¥xf4 ¦xf4 23.¥xc6 ¦xf1+ 24.¦xf1 ¤xc6
25.£h7! ¦d8 26.¦f7 d3+ 27.¢g2 ¢a8! 28.¦xb7
£a6 29.¦b3 ¤xe5 30.¤b5 £c6+ 31.¢h3 ¤f7
32.£xf7 ¦h8+ 33.¢g4 £e4+ and perpetual check.
21...¤b4 22.a5 £c5 23.£h7 d3+?!
23...¤f5! 24.¥xc6 ¦g7! 25.£h3 ¤xc2 would
have been better for Black.
24.¢h1 d2 25.¥xd2?
Both 25.£xe7 ¥xf3 26.gxf3 £g1+ 27.¦xg1 ¦xg1+
28.¢xg1 d1£+ 29.¢f2 £xc2+ and 25.¥a3 ¥xf3
26.gxf3 £e3 27.£xe7 ¦g1+ 28.¦xg1 £xf3+
29.¦g2 d1£+ 30.¦xd1 £xd1+ lead to perpetual.
25...cxd2 26.£xe7 ¦xf4 26...¤d5! 27.£xe6
¤xf4 28.£c4 ¥xf3 29.gxf3 £xc4 30.¤xc4 ¦g2
leaves White helpless.
27.¦ab1 ¦gf8?
More logical was the simple 27...£xc2! 28.£xe6
(28.¥xc6 £xc6 29.¦g1 a6! followed by 30...¦fg4
and Black wins; not 29...¦fg4? in this line
because of 30.¦bf1! and White counters to a
draw!) 28...¦h8 29.¥xc6 ¦xf1+ 30.¦xf1 d1£–+.
28.c4!
The best practical chance.
28...a6 29.h3 ¢a8! 30.£g7 £e3??
Throws away the win! 30...¤d3! 31.¤xb7 £a7!
was still winning for Black.
31.¢h2 d1£?
Black s only move was 31...¦b8 and after the
forced sequence 32.¥xc6 bxc6 33.¤e8! ¦xe8
34.¦xb4 £a7 35.£xa7+ ¢xa7 36.¦d1 ¦d8
37.¦b2 ¦f2 38.¢g3 ¦e2 39.¢f3 ¦xe5 40.¦bxd2
¦f8+ he retains some drawing chances.
32.¦bxd1 and here Kamsky lost on time. 1–0
(Diagram)
21.a4?!
KARJAKIN - KAMSKY
2 of 4
788960167.020.png 788960167.021.png 788960167.022.png 788960167.023.png 788960167.024.png 788960167.025.png 788960167.026.png 788960167.027.png 788960167.028.png 788960167.029.png 788960167.030.png 788960167.031.png 788960167.032.png 788960167.033.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 17, April 29, 2009
THIS WEEK’S HARVEST
Petroff 8.¦e1, 9.c4
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-WQ-TRK+0
9ZPP+-VLPZPP0
9-+-+N+-+0
9+P+N+-+-0
9-+-+-+-+0
9+Q+-VL-+-0
9PZP-+-ZPPZP0
9TR-+-TR-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤f6 3.¤xe5 d6 4.¤f3 ¤xe4 5.d4 d5 6.¥d3 ¤c6 7.0–0 ¥e7 8.¦e1 ¥g4 9.c4 ¤f6 10.¤c3 ¥xf3 11.£xf3 ¤xd4
12.£d1 ¤e6 13.cxd5 ¤xd5 14.¥b5+ c6 15.¤xd5 cxb5 16.£b3 0–0 17.¥e3
As we mentioned last week, in Akopian-Kasimdzhanov Black was fine in the traditional main line 8.c4. Since the
two losses Kramnik had to suffer in Dortmund last summer, we know that the old 8.¦e1 is still full of surprises.
The amazing piece of homework Leko-Gelfand with the gambit style 17.¥e3!? proved just that. After the
decisive mistake 26...¤e5? a long chain of tactics decided the game. In round twelve the discussion continued.
In Akopian-Gelfand Black succesfully repaired his repertoire with the uncommon 10...¤xd4!?, a line that has
been played by Karpov and more recently Gashimov. At the same time Leko was already one step ahead and
created new problems for Black against Kasimdzhanov with the modern 8.¤c3. Again the powerful Hungarian
successfully conducted a direct attack against the Black ¢ in the Petroff, a truely remarkable feat. We think Black
may have to return to 8...¥f5 in this case.
Ruy Lopez, Breyer
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-WQRVLK+0
9+L+-+P+-0
9P+-+-SNP+0
9+PZPPZP-+P0
9P+P+P+-+0
9+-ZP-+NSNP0
9-ZP-WQ-ZPP+0
9TR-+LTR-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 a6 4.¥a4 ¤f6 5.0–0 ¥e7 6.¦e1 b5 7.¥b3 d6 8.c3 0–0 9.h3 ¤b8 10.d4 ¤bd7 11.¤bd2 ¥b7 12.¥c2
¦e8 13.¤f1 ¥f8 14.¤g3 g6 15.a4 c5 16.d5 c4 17.¥g5 h6 18.¥e3 ¤c5 19.£d2 h5 20.¥xc5 dxc5 21.¥d1
In recent years our game has become more and more concrete. Twenty years ago it wouldn t have come to
anyone s mind to give up the good bishop with 20.¥xc5, giving Black a nice blockading square for his knight on
d6. Nowadays, with assistance of the computer (note that White s 20.¥xc5 is Rybka s first choice!), it becomes
clear that Black experiences some difficulties trying to manoeuvre the ¤ to d6. In a previous game Volokitin-
Harikrishna, it took the latter a lot of time to carry it this plan and even had to pay a high prize for it: giving up the
a-file. Grischuk and Kamsky were most likely familiar with this new approach, since Kamsky is employing the
Breyer regularly. In the game Grischuk gradually increased his advantage, but in time trouble it all vanished and
eventually he even had to accept defeat.
Slav, Anti-Meran
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+L+-TRK+0
9+-+N+PZPP0
9P+P+-VL-+0
9+P+-+-+-0
9-+-SN-ZP-+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9PZP-+LZPPZP0
9TR-VLR+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.¤f3 ¤f6 4.¤c3 e6 5.e3 ¤bd7 6.£c2 ¥d6 7.¥d3 0–0 8.0–0 dxc4 9.¥xc4 a6 10.¦d1 b5 11.¥e2 £c7 12.¤e4
¤xe4 13.£xe4 e5 14.£d3! exd4 15.£xd4 ¥e7 16.£f4 £xf4 17.exf4 ¥f6 18.¤d4
While the Latvian Attack 6.£c2 ¥d6 7.g4 is obviously still dangerous for Black as was confirmed in Mamedyarov-
Svidler, the more positional approach with 7.¥d3 contains no less poison as was shown in Kasimdzhanov-
Aronian. In fact David Vigorito goes as far as to suggest the somewhat offbeat 8...h6!? in Play the Semi-Slav .
9...e5 is another early alternative. The next choice Black has to make is between 13...e5 as played in the game
or the somewhat annoying 13...¥e7 14.¥d2 ¥b7 15.¦ac1 c5 16.£b1 £b6 17.dxc5 ¤xc5 18.¥c3 ¥e4 19.£a1(!), a
Karpov line in the style of Réti. With 14.£d3! Kasimdzhanov pushed the game on new territory and with 16.£f4!
he surprisingly offered the exchange of queens while allowing doubled f-pawns. Black has trouble getting his
pieces out and Aronian may not want to end up in the same ending again.
Queen s Gambit, Vienna
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-TRK+R+0
9+P+-+P+P0
9P+-+PZP-+0
9+-SN-ZP-+-0
9-TR-+-+-WQ0
9+-WQ-+N+-0
9P+-+-ZPPZP0
9+-+-+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 d5 4.¤c3 dxc4 5.e4 ¥b4 6.¥g5 c5 7.¥xc4 cxd4 8.¤xd4 ¥xc3+ 9.bxc3 £a5 10.¥b5+ ¥d7 11.¥xf6
gxf6 12.¥xd7+ ¤xd7 13.0–0 a6 14.¦b1 £c7 15.£h5 ¤c5 16.¦b4 £e5 17.£h4 ¦d8 18.¤f3 £xc3 19.e5 ¦g8
The risky character of the Vienna Defence isn t anyone s cup of tea, but according to the current theoretical
status of the opening Black is OK. While leaving the king on his initial square, the heavy pieces are brought
into the centre with the aim to be exchanged, having in mind Black is doing fine in the endings. Since the game
Gustafsson-Naiditsch, 15...¢e7?! has lost all its credits, but thanks to efforts of Polish GM Macieja 15...¤c5
followed by 17...£g5 has obtained a relatively safe assessment. Aronian went for the less explored 17...¦d8
followed by 19...¦g8 which is a serious improvement on the game Tkachiev-Balogh, where Black lost without
any chance. Despite underestimating Gelfands 23.g3! and overlooking 29.¤h7, the Armenian was never in real
trouble and so the game ended peacefully. The ball is back in White s court in the Vienna!
3 of 4
788960167.034.png 788960167.035.png 788960167.036.png 788960167.037.png 788960167.038.png 788960167.039.png 788960167.040.png 788960167.041.png 788960167.042.png 788960167.043.png 788960167.044.png 788960167.045.png 788960167.046.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 17, April 29, 2009
OPENING EXPERT
Who: Boris Gelfand
Born: June 24, 1968
Nationality: Israel
Rating: 2733
Expertise: White: Catalan. Black: Slav, Petroff and Najdorf
Why: The Belarussian born super GM is one of the most renowned opening
theoreticians. Despite his relative old age, he doesn’t experience any
problems maintaining himself in the top 20 of the world, which is mainly
dominated by players half his age. His opening preparation is mostly
based on his own ideas and knowledge which he works out in detail with
the computer. Two other examples, where his experience serves him
well by winning the opening battle, are added in the PGN file.
Kasimdzhanov - Gelfand, 4th FIDE GP Nalchik, April 23, 2009
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.¤f3 ¤f6 4.¤c3 e6 5.¥g5 h6
6.¥h4 dxc4 7.e4 g5 8.¥g3 b5 9.¤e5 ¤bd7!?
A novelty Gelfand discovered without the help
of the computer.
10.¤xc6 £b6 11.d5 ¥b7 12.a4 a6 13.¥e2 ¥g7
14.dxe6
14.0–0 0–0 15.¥d6 (threatening a5) 15...¥xc6
16.dxc6 £xc6 17.¥xf8 ¦xf8 gives Black more
than enough compensation. 14.¥d6 ¤xe4!?
(14...¥xc6 15.dxc6 £xc6 16.axb5 axb5
17.¦xa8+ £xa8 18.0–0 Black s king is stuck in
the centre) 15.¤xe4 exd5 16.¥b4 ¥f8 with an
unclear game (16...dxe4? 17.£d6 ¥f8 18.£e6+!
fxe6 19.¥h5#).
14...¥xc6 15.exd7+ ¤xd7 16.axb5 axb5
17.¦xa8+ ¥xa8 18.0–0 ¤e5 19.¤d5 £c5
20.¢h1?!
Aiming to push the f-pawn only further weakens
White s centre. Better was 20.£d2 0–0 21.h4.
20...0–0 21.f4?! gxf4 22.¥xf4 f5!
Dynamic chess! Black s bishops are murderers
and due to Blacks queenside majority, White will
collapse soon. Gelfand admitted that until here
he had already seen everything at home.
23.b4?
A bad move, but 23.¥e3 £d6 24.¤c3 £xd1
25.¦xd1 b4 won t change much.
23...£d6 24.¥f3 fxe4 25.¥xe4 ¦d8 26.¦f2 c3!
Not 26...¥xd5? 27.¦d2.
27.¦f3 ¥xd5 28.¦d3 ¤xd3!
A fantastic piece of opening preparation!
0–1
XIIIIIIIIY
9L+-+-TRK+0
9+-+-+-VL-0
9-+-+-+-ZP0
9+PWQNSNP+-0
9-+P+PVL-+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9-ZP-+L+PZP0
9+-+Q+R+K0
XIIIIIIIIY
www.chessvibes.com/openings
ChessVibes Openings is a weekly PDF magazine that covers the latest news on chess openings. Which openings are hot in top level chess?
Which are not? Editors IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris keep you updated once a week! Singles issues cost € 1. You can subscribe too:
€ 18 for six months / € 25 a year (that’s less than € 0.50 per issue!). More info can be found at www.chessvibes.com/openings .
© 2009 ChessVibes. Copyright exists in all original material published by ChessVibes. Any copying or distribution (reproduction, via print, electronic format, or in any form whatsoever), as
well as posting on the web, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
4 of 4
788960167.047.png 788960167.048.png 788960167.049.png 788960167.050.png 788960167.052.png 788960167.053.png 788960167.054.png 788960167.055.png 788960167.056.png 788960167.057.png 788960167.058.png 788960167.059.png 788960167.060.png 788960167.061.png 788960167.063.png
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin